Abstract

In this article, the author argues that Method sections in social science research reports, particularly those that employ qualitative methods, often lack sufficient detail to make any results that follow from the analytic method trustworthy. The author provides a brief review of the evolution of the Method section from the 1960s to the present, makes a case for a more robust reporting of research method, and then outlines one way to achieve the end of providing a detailed, specific account of research methods that enable readers to understand unambiguously the means by which data are rendered into results. This consideration includes attention to the reporting of data collection, data reduction, data analysis, and the context of the investigation to make it clear why an illustrative presentation of data supports the claim that it offers.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
2008-07-01
DOI
10.1177/0741088308317815
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (60)

  1. College Composition and Communication
  2. Written Communication
  3. Written Communication
  4. Technical Communication Quarterly
  5. Written Communication
Show all 60 →
  1. Computers and Composition
  2. Technical Communication Quarterly
  3. Technical Communication Quarterly
  4. Research in the Teaching of English
  5. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  6. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  7. Written Communication
  8. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  9. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  10. Written Communication
  11. Computers and Composition
  12. College Composition and Communication
  13. Technical Communication Quarterly
  14. Written Communication
  15. Written Communication
  16. Written Communication
  17. Technical Communication Quarterly
  18. College Composition and Communication
  19. Computers and Composition
  20. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  21. Written Communication
  22. Written Communication
  23. College Composition and Communication
  24. Research in the Teaching of English
  25. Research in the Teaching of English
  26. Technical Communication Quarterly
  27. Technical Communication Quarterly
  28. Research in the Teaching of English
  29. Written Communication
  30. Technical Communication Quarterly
  31. Written Communication
  32. Written Communication
  33. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  34. College English
  35. Research in the Teaching of English
  36. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  37. Research in the Teaching of English
  38. Research in the Teaching of English
  39. Written Communication
  40. Written Communication
  41. Pedagogy
  42. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  43. Written Communication
  44. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  45. Written Communication
  46. Written Communication
  47. Technical Communication Quarterly
  48. Written Communication
  49. Written Communication
  50. Written Communication
  51. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  52. Written Communication
  53. Pedagogy
  54. Written Communication
  55. Written Communication

Cites in this index (7)

  1. Written Communication
  2. Written Communication
  3. Research in the Teaching of English
  4. Written Communication
  5. Written Communication
Show all 7 →
  1. Research in the Teaching of English
  2. Research in the Teaching of English
Also cites 12 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.58680/ee20065943
    English Education  
  2. 10.7551/mitpress/5657.001.0001
  3. 10.3102/00346543065003191
  4. 10.1207/s15327884mca0503_2
  5. 10.1080/08878730609555396
  6. 10.1080/10573560701501552
  7. 10.1598/RRQ.40.1.4
  8. 10.1080/10862969509547884
  9. 10.1080/1057356950110404
  10. 10.58680/ee20042810
    English Education  
  11. 10.1598/RRQ.33.2.3
  12. 10.1111/j.1754-8845.2005.tb00617.x
CrossRef global citation count: 356 View in citation network →