Content Analysis, Construct Validity, and Artificial Intelligence: Implications for Technical and Professional Communication and Graduate Research Preparation

Stuart Deets Twin Cities Orthopedics ; Caitlin Baulch University of Minnesota ; Alison Obright Twin Cities Orthopedics ; Dan Card University of Minnesota

Abstract

Artificial intelligence tools are being increasingly used to do content analysis in technical and professional communication (TPC). The authors consider some of the affordances and constraints of these tools and suggest that construct validity is an underdiscussed form of validity within TPC research that will become more important as artificial intelligence research tools become increasingly prevalent. But construct validity is an important idea for graduate programming on research methods regardless of the type of method, technique, or tool used—whether qualitative or computational. Thus, training in construct validity is important for strengthening graduate research preparation in TPC.

Journal
Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Published
2024-07-01
DOI
10.1177/10506519241239951
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Journal of Business and Technical Communication

Cites in this index (8)

  1. Technical Communication Quarterly
  2. Technical Communication Quarterly
  3. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  4. Technical Communication Quarterly
  5. Written Communication
Show all 8 →
  1. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  2. Written Communication
  3. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Also cites 11 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1109/TPC.2010.2077450
  2. 10.46300/9107.2020.14.5
    International Journal of Communication  
  3. 10.1140/epjds/s13688-022-00353-7
  4. 10.17239/jowr-2016.07.03.05
  5. 10.2307/3178066
  6. 10.55177/tc350749
  7. 10.1080/10810730.2020.1737761
  8. 10.4135/9781071878781
  9. 10.1109/TPC.2018.2870632
  10. 10.1080/17524032.2021.1954538
  11. 10.1002/wcc.806
CrossRef global citation count: 2 View in citation network →