Abstract

This article offers a longitudinal computational-rhetorical analysis of biomedical writing on opioids. Using a corpus of 1,467 articles and essays published in the New England Journal of Medicine and the Journal of the American Medical Association between 1959 and May 2019, this study evaluates diachronic shifts in (a) the framing of opioid pharmacology, (b) the relative attention paid to pain management versus opioid dependence risks, and (c) the distribution of statements related to physicians’ primary ethical obligations. The results of these analyses largely disconfirm different current accounts of shifting physician rhetoric around opioids and pain management leading up to the recognition opioid epidemic. Most notably, the results also suggest that biomedical debates surrounding opioids are serving as proxy arguments for shifting primary bioethical obligations from individual patients to public health.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
2021-01-01
DOI
10.1177/0741088320944918
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
OA PDF Bronze
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (6)

  1. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  2. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  3. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  4. Technical Communication Quarterly
  5. Technical Communication Quarterly
Show all 6 →
  1. Technical Communication Quarterly

References (31) · 3 in this index

  1. 10.1177/1073110517750600
  2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2018). Understanding the epidemic. https://www.cdc.gov/dru…
  3. 10.1056/NEJMra1508490
  4. 10.1177/1073110517703310
  5. 10.1016/j.amjmed.2017.12.045
Show all 31 →
  1. 10.1080/10510978609368212
  2. 10.7208/chicago/9780226264196.001.0001
  3. Technical Communication Quarterly
  4. 10.2307/j.ctt21668mb
  5. Verbal style and the presidency: A computer-based analysis
  6. Rhetoric and the digital humanities
  7. Textual dynamics of the professions: Historical and contemporary studies of writing in pr…
  8. 10.1177/1049732305276687
  9. 10.1016/S0261-3794(99)00028-1
  10. JAMA . (2019). Instructions for authors. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/pages/in…
  11. The Joint Commission (TJC). (2016). Joint Commission statement on pain management. https://www.jointcommissio…
  12. 10.1016/S0955-3959(02)00151-2
  13. 10.1023/A:1026638111488
  14. Doing news framing analysis: Empirical and theoretical perspectives
  15. Technical Communication Quarterly
  16. 10.1136/bmj.j4792
  17. 10.1007/978-94-009-3645-4_7
  18. New England Journal of Medicine . (2020). Article types. https://www.nejm.org/author-ce…
  19. Journal of Writing Research
  20. Omizo R., Hart-Davidson W. (2016b). Hedge-o-matic. enculturation. http://hedgeomatic.cal.msu.edu/hedgeomatic/
  21. Missouri Medicine
  22. 10.5325/j.ctv14gpcn0
  23. Szalavitz M. (2019). When the cure is worse than the disease. New York Times, February 9. https://www.nytimes…
  24. 10.1093/pm/pnw352
  25. Wickham H. (2019). stringr: Simple, consistent wrappers for common string operations. https://cran.r-project.…
  26. 10.1016/0140-6736(93)92425-S