Dead Reckoning: A Framework for Analyzing Positionality Statements in Ethnographic Research Reporting

Written Communication Oct 2022

Dead Reckoning: A Framework for Analyzing Positionality Statements in Ethnographic Research Reporting

Roehl Sybing Doshisha University

Abstract

As essential as positionality is to qualitative research involving engagement with research participants, contemporary scholarly discussion of positionality is mainly aimed at educating emerging researchers about acknowledging their own subjectivities. In turn, there is little consensus regarding how authors should address positionality in writing for research publication. Emphasizing the importance of written positionality as a component of research transparency, this article proposes a framework for positionality in ethnographic research writing. The author collected 59 ethnographies published in peer-reviewed academic journals to study the extent to which researcher positionality is established or can be inferred through the writing of research. The analysis identifies a series of considerations for research writing such as the form of writing, sociocultural identities, relationships with research participants, and the resulting implications. The author proposes this framework as a guide for qualitative researchers who benefit from explicitly situating themselves in the research process through their writing.

Journal: Written Communication
Published: 2022-10-01
DOI: 10.1177/07410883221114152
Open Access: Closed
Topics: qualitative research

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

Silva (2025)

Objectivity bias in first-year research writing: The impact of perceived neutra…

Computers and Composition

Cites in this index (3)

Falconer (2019)

“I Think When I Speak, I Don’t Sound Like That”: The Influence of Social Positi…

Written Communication
Tardy et al. (2009)

The Construction of Author Voice by Editorial Board Members

Written Communication
Smagorinsky (2008)

The Method Section as Conceptual Epicenter in Constructing Social Science Resea…

Written Communication

Also cites 42 works outside this index ↓

10.1111/joms.12356

↗
10.1111/anhu.12326

↗
10.1086/692825

↗
10.1177/1468794107085301

↗
10.1177/1049732318812448

↗
10.1080/17450101.2017.1292056

↗
10.4135/9781526430212.n23

↗
10.1080/17457823.2019.1582348

↗
10.1177/0890334419830990

↗
10.1017/CBO9781139169202

↗
10.1080/2159676X.2013.796487

↗
10.4135/9781529716634

↗
10.1177/1468794119891583

↗
10.1177/0959354308101417

↗
10.1146/annurev.an.05.100176.001553

↗
10.34293/education.v8i4.3232

↗
10.1080/14759551.2019.1601722

↗
10.25071/2291-5796.43

↗
10.1016/j.learninstruc.2004.01.001

↗
10.1080/17439884.2019.1639191

↗
10.1080/17470211003602412

↗
10.1108/HE-10-2016-0053

↗
10.1515/text-2020-2073

↗
10.1108/S1042-319220160000014017

↗
10.1177/1049732317748896

↗
10.20533/ijtie.2047.0533.2016.0096

↗
10.18061/dsq.v33i2.3708

↗
10.1080/14616688.2017.1387810

↗
10.1177/0001839219887663

↗
Sandelowski M. (1998). Writing a good read: Strategies for re-presenting qualitative data. Research in Nursin…

↗
10.1177/1468794119841839

↗
10.1177/1468794105048657

↗
10.1080/14427591.2017.1378119

↗
10.1017/S1049096519002233

↗
10.31219/osf.io/6efvp

↗
10.4324/9780203097076

↗
10.1177/1077800410383121

↗
Tregaskis C. (2004). Identity, positionality and power: Issues for disabled researchers. A response paper to …

↗
10.1037/qup0000062

↗
10.1111/j.1365-2648.1992.tb01974.x

↗
10.1007/s00163-018-00304-2

↗
10.1007/s12182-020-00473-7

↗

CrossRef global citation count: 22 View in citation network →