Abstract

In this paper, I explore first-year students' self-reported preferences for choosing source material in a digital, research-based writing setting. I argue that widespread skepticism towards online information has led to an "objectivity bias," where students prefer sources perceived as neutral and objective. Through qualitative interviews, I report that this bias may result in an overreliance on data-driven and empiricist sources, often at the expense of valuable personal narratives and experiential knowledge. I highlight the role of digital platforms and search algorithms in shaping these preferences and discuss the implications for teaching information literacy.

Journal
Computers and Composition
Published
2025-06-01
DOI
10.1016/j.compcom.2025.102925
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
OA PDF Hybrid
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (50) · 1 in this index

  1. On the dangers of stochastic parrots: Can language models be too big?
    Proceedings of the 2021 ACM conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency
  2. COVID-19 misinformation online and health literacy: A brief overview
    International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health  
  3. Source evaluation of domain experts and novices during web search
    Journal of Computer Assisted Learning  
  4. Students’ civic online reasoning: A national portrait
    Educational Researcher  
  5. The research paper and why we should still care
    Writing Program Administration
Show all 50 →
  1. Unmasking AI: My mission to protect what is human in a world of machines
  2. Analysis: A new measure of Americans’ deep distrust of the media
  3. Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment
  4. What is “container collapse” and why should librarians and teachers care?
    OCLC blog
  5. If it is too inconvenient I'm not going after it:” convenience as a critical factor in in…
    Library & Information Science Research  
  6. Undergraduate search strategies and evaluation criteria: searching for credible sources
    New Library World  
  7. Galison. Objectivity
  8. Data feminism
  9. Humanities approaches to graphical display
    Digital Humanities Quarterly
  10. Assisting students to identify sources: an investigation
    Library Review  
  11. Post-Truth, fake news and democracy: mapping the politics of falsehood
  12. Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education. (2015). Association of College and Research Librarie…
  13. Critical search: A procedure for guided reading in large-scale textual corpora
    Journal of Cultural Analytics  
  14. Striking the balance between fake and real: under what conditions can media literacy mess…
    Behaviour & Information Technology  
  15. Social media information literacy: conceptualization and associations with information ov…
    Computers in Human Behavior  
  16. Browsing through bias: The library of Congress classification and subject headings for Af…
    Library Trends  
  17. Generative AI in writing research papers: A new type of algorithmic bias and uncertainty …
    Intelligent Systems Conference
  18. Negative downstream effects of alarmist disinformation discourse: evidence from the Unite…
    Political Behavior
  19. How the news media activate public expression and influence national agendas
    Science  
  20. More americans – especially young adults – are regularly getting news on Tiktok
  21. Why do I have authority to edit the page? The politics of user agency and participation o…
    Wikipedia  
  22. Lowe, M.S., Macy, K.V., Murphy, E., & Kani, J. (2021). Questioning CRAAP: A comparison of source evaluation m…
  23. How do you know that?: an investigation of student research practices in the digital age
    Portal: Libraries and the Academy  
  24. Can students evaluate online sources? Learning from assessments of civic online reasoning
    Theory & research in social education  
  25. A plea for critical race theory counterstory: stock story versus counterstory dialogues c…
    Composition Studies
  26. Beyond fake news: culturally relevant media literacies for a fractured civic landscape
    Theory Into Practice  
  27. Digital news report 2023
  28. Pew Research Center. (2024). News platform fact sheet. https://www.pewresearch.org/journalism/fact-sheet/news…
  29. Measuring trust perception during information evaluation
    2022 14th International Conference on Information Technology and Electrical Engineering (ICITEE)
  30. Common dispositions and habits of mind: the ACRL and WPA frameworks in conversation for t…
    Teaching Information Literacy and Writing Studies
  31. Seminar in Composition. The University of Pittsburgh. Accessed 24 March 2023. https://composition.pitt.edu/un…
  32. What is critical literacy?
    Journal of Pedagogy, Pluralism, and Practice
  33. Trust and mistrust of online health sites
    Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems
  34. AI-powered search and the rise of Google's “concierge Wikipedia.”
  35. Source evaluation behaviours of first-year university students
    Journal of Information Literacy  
  36. Authority, Information Justice, and Source-Based Writing: Cultivating a Critically Curiou…
    Doctoral dissertation
  37. What do first-year students find reliable in online sources?
    Kairos: A Journal of Rhetoric, Technology, and Pedagogy
  38. Our story
    Cite black women
  39. Spontaneous sourcing among students reading multiple documents
    Cognition and Instruction  
  40. The main model: A heuristic approach to understanding technology effects on credibility
  41. Written Communication
  42. Can fighting misinformation have a negative spillover effect? How warnings for the threat…
    Journalism Studies  
  43. How attitude strength biases information processing and evaluation on the web
    Computers in Human Behavior  
  44. The effects of teaching about the replication crisis on undergraduates’ epistemic dependence
  45. Lateral reading: reading less and learning more when evaluating digital information (Stanford history education group working paper no. o2017-A1)