Abstract

Part of learning a discipline’s genres is learning how one’s work must be presented. Students confronting this economy of genre sometimes chafe at its restrictions, and their apprehension reveals unsuspected stakes for technical communication. In interviews, students discuss how their final presentations fail to capture the sophistication and the nuances of their designs, suggesting that learning genres is not just about participation but also about letting go of competing ways of conceiving practice.

Journal
Technical Communication Quarterly
Published
2020-04-02
DOI
10.1080/10572252.2019.1689297
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (4)

  1. Technical Communication Quarterly
  2. Technical Communication Quarterly
  3. Technical Communication Quarterly
  4. Written Communication

Cites in this index (11)

  1. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  2. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  3. Written Communication
  4. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  5. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Show all 11 →
  1. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  2. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  3. Written Communication
  4. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  5. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  6. Written Communication
Also cites 12 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.2307/j.ctt7zw9z8
  2. 10.37514/PER-B.2009.2324.2.08
  3. 10.4135/9781446268278.n21
  4. 10.2307/j.ctt46nxp6
  5. 10.1080/03634520216513
  6. 10.7208/chicago/9780226206868.001.0001
  7. Spurious coin: A history of science, management, and technical writing
  8. 10.1002/9780470696088.ch19
  9. 10.2307/4140684
  10. 10.37514/PER-B.2012.0452.2.27
  11. 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2008.tb00984.x
  12. 10.2307/357883
CrossRef global citation count: 4 View in citation network →