Abstract

Introduction: This tutorial article explicates some of the 2017 updates to the 1991 Common Rule. Implemented in January 2019, these changes impact the evolving landscape of research with human participants in the US. The introduction provides context for the article as well as framing research questions. Key concepts: These include a brief definition of research for the purposes of the article; a discussion of the foundational ethical principles of autonomy (respect for persons), beneficence, and justice; and a brief overview of the recent policy revision process and its impact on scholarship in the field. After establishing this context, readers are provided five key lessons from the policy revisions. Key lessons: The lessons for researchers working with human participants include discussion of the impact of policy changes in the Common Rule associated with broad consent, single Institutional Review Board (IRB) mandate/cooperative review, updated exemptions, modified definitions of vulnerability, and international research. These are all contextualized within a specific example for professional communication researchers. Implications for practice: Although educative efforts are underway at both the federal and institutional levels, it is important for disciplines and researchers to understand how policy changes will impact the IRB review process. Attendance to the infrastructures that guide our research design and development warrants attention.

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Published
2020-03-01
DOI
10.1109/tpc.2019.2961011
CompPile
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (2)

  1. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  2. Journal of Business and Technical Communication

References (61) · 14 in this index

  1. College Composition and Communication
  2. Conference on college composition and communication executive committee guidelines for th…
  3. College Composition and Communication
  4. 10.4324/9780203877203
  5. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Show all 61 →
  1. Technical Communication Quarterly
  2. 10.2307/358560
  3. Ethics, institutional review boards, and the involvement of human participants in composi…
    Ethics and Representation in Qualitative Studies of Literacy
  4. Digital spaces, online environments, and human participant research: Interfacing with ins…
    Digital Writing Research Technologies Methodologies and Ethical Issues
  5. 10.4324/9781315303758-8
  6. 10.1162/COLI_a_00057
  7. 10.2308/bria-50651
  8. Written Communication
  9. National Center for Education Statistics classification of instructional programs codes
  10. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  11. Revised common rule
  12. NPRM for revisions to the common rule
  13. 10.1097/00000441-200111000-00002
  14. Institutional review boards and writing studies research: A justice-oriented study
  15. US Department of Health and Human Services
  16. Federal policy for the protection of human subjects docket
  17. Delay of the revisions to the federal policy
  18. Six month delay of general compliance date
  19. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  20. ‘All Vietnamese men are brothers’: Rhetorical strategies and community enga…
    Tech Commun
  21. What psychology's crisis means for the future of science
    Vox
  22. 10.1177/1745691612465253
  23. 10.1038/466029a
  24. Revised common rule basics
  25. Changes to the common rule regulatory requirements
  26. Updates to the ‘common rule’: Implications for international service-learni…
    Int J Res Service-Learn Community Engagement
  27. Balanced Ethics Review A Guide for Institutional Review Board Members
  28. Institutional Review Board Member Handbook
  29. College Composition and Communication
  30. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  31. 10.1353/ken.2004.0044
  32. 10.1080/15265160490497083
  33. 10.1136/medethics-2017-104446
  34. 10.1080/15265161.2017.1329482
  35. Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
  36. Facebook manipulated user news feeds to create emotional response
    Forbes
  37. Genetic research among the Havasupai: A cautionary tale
    AMA Journal of Ethics  
  38. Ethical Imperialism Institutional Review Boards and the Social Sciences
  39. 10.7551/mitpress/9780262028912.001.0001
  40. The Ethics Police? The Struggle to Make Human Research Safe
  41. Should all disciplines be subject to the common rule?
    Academe
  42. Office for Human Research Protections
  43. 10.1177/0038038512448567
  44. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  45. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  46. 10.1177/0038038508094573
  47. College Composition and Communication
  48. Playing scavenger and gazer with scientific discourse: Opportunities and ethics for onlin…
    Digital Writing Research Technologies Methodologies and Ethical Issues
  49. The Ethics of Internet Research A Rhetorical Case-Based Process
  50. College Composition and Communication
  51. Computers and Composition