Abstract

This article investigates the strategies web-writers develop when their audiences respond to them via textual participation. Focusing on three web-writers who want to “continue the conversation,” this article identifies five major strategies to accomplish this aim: (a) editing after production, (b) quotation, (c) question posing, (d) naming secondary writers, and (e) textual listening. Using the lens of writer-audience tension, I find that due to these web-writers’ perceptions of audience, one that is partially externalized via the website’s template, the term audience itself may not be a discrete concept, but a fluid, evolving, and recursive one, in other words, ongoing. These perceptions of audience reflect the unending nature of online texts and are exemplified by these five strategies.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
2015-10-01
DOI
10.1177/0741088315601006
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (12)

  1. Communication Design Quarterly
  2. Written Communication
  3. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  4. Computers and Composition
  5. College Composition and Communication
Show all 12 →
  1. Computers and Composition
  2. Technical Communication Quarterly
  3. Technical Communication Quarterly
  4. Computers and Composition
  5. Written Communication
  6. Technical Communication Quarterly
  7. Written Communication

References (58) · 10 in this index

  1. Computers and Composition
  2. When a writer can’t write: Studies in writer’s block and other composing-process problems
  3. 10.2307/358046
  4. International Journal of Communication
  5. 10.1080/17512786.2012.740172
Show all 58 →
  1. 10.1509/jmkr.43.3.345
  2. 10.1002/asi.23180
  3. 10.1016/j.tele.2014.08.007
  4. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  5. On the case: Approaches to language and literacy research
  6. Citizen critics
  7. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  8. 10.2307/358093
  9. Engaging audience: Writing in an age of new literacies
  10. Gallagher J. (2014). Interactive audience and the Internet (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://sch…
  11. Computers and Composition
  12. Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses, critical perspectives on liter…
  13. The presentation of self in everyday life
  14. Forms of talk
  15. The condition of postmodernity
  16. Research in the Teaching of English
  17. 10.1080/00913367.2015.1018461
  18. 10.4135/9781483329086.n2
  19. Written Communication
  20. 10.1177/1075547014556195
  21. 10.1080/08838151.2012.705195
  22. 10.1080/10646175.2012.695643
  23. College Composition and Communication
  24. 10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.004
  25. 10.1080/17512786.2014.938943
  26. 10.1177/1461444810365313
  27. Qualitative research design
  28. 10.1207/s15389286ajde1802_3
  29. 10.1177/0361684314565777
  30. Research on writing: Principles and methods
  31. O’Reilly T. (2005). What is Web 2.0? Design patterns and business models for the next generation. Retrieved f…
  32. The new rhetoric: A treatise on argumentation
  33. 10.7551/mitpress/10288.001.0001
  34. Audience and rhetoric
  35. Computers and Composition
  36. Rhetorical listening: Identification, gender, whiteness
  37. 10.1177/1077699012447923
  38. 10.7551/mitpress/10116.001.0001
  39. 10.2307/j.ctt5hjqwx
  40. Digital writing research: Technologies, methodologies, and ethical issues
  41. 10.1080/1369118X.2014.940365
  42. 10.1080/1461670X.2014.972076
  43. 10.1080/17512786.2013.813194
  44. Written Communication
  45. 10.1080/1369118X.2014.997268
  46. The art of case study research
  47. Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory
  48. 10.1080/00223980.2013.879847
  49. 10.1080/1461670X.2014.969491
  50. Publics and protopublics
  51. Computers and Composition
  52. Case study research: Design and methods
  53. 10.1111/jcom.12123