Pragmatic Competence in an Email Writing Task: Influences of Situation, L1 Background, and L2 Proficiency

Wenjuan Qin Fudan University ; Roujia Jia Fudan University ; Wei Ren Beihang University

Abstract

The study examines a corpus of 306 request emails written by 32 English-speaking (ES) teachers and 121 L2 learners from distinctive L1 backgrounds (i.e., Chinese, French, Spanish) and with different levels of L2 proficiency. Pragmatic competence is analyzed through the coding of direct and indirect request strategies used in formal and informal email writing. Findings reveal the influences of communicative situation, L1 background, and L2 proficiency on pragmatic competence in email writing. First, L2 learners show a significantly lower degree of situational variability compared with ES teachers. Second, L1 backgrounds have a significant impact on L2 writing performance. Third, L2 learners with higher English proficiency tend to use more indirect request strategies, but they have not developed pragmatic competence to adjust their usage across written contexts. Findings are discussed in relation to pedagogical implications for developing writing competence of L2 learners, which should be attuned to diverse rhetorical expectations and individual needs.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
10.1177/07410883241263543
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (5)

  1. Written Communication
  2. Written Communication
  3. Written Communication
  4. Written Communication
  5. Written Communication
Also cites 39 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1093/applin/amr031
  2. 10.2307/3587583
  3. 10.1093/applin/5.3.196
  4. 10.1017/CBO9780511813085
  5. 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.715843
  6. 10.1515/cercles-2022-2055
  7. 10.1515/iprg.2005.2.3.275
  8. 10.1075/pbns.328
  9. 10.1348/026151007X253260
  10. 10.1515/IP.2007.013
  11. 10.1016/j.system.2014.09.023
  12. 10.1016/j.system.2017.06.011
  13. 10.1093/oso/9780195066029.001.0001
  14. 10.2307/415556
  15. 10.5539/elt.v5n2p50
  16. 10.1016/j.jslw.2022.100962
  17. 10.1016/j.system.2022.102823
  18. 10.5054/tq.2011.240859
  19. 10.1016/j.pragma.2012.02.010
  20. 10.1558/eap.38695
  21. 10.1016/j.pragma.2019.01.017
  22. 10.1017/9781009082709
  23. 10.4324/9781315833835
  24. 10.1002/9781444315783.ch29
  25. 10.1016/j.pragma.2018.10.004
  26. 10.1016/j.asw.2020.100465
  27. 10.1007/s11145-022-10367-2
  28. 10.17263/jlls.547766
  29. 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00985.x
  30. 10.17507/jltr.0903.14
  31. 10.1017/S0272263100014881
  32. 10.1111/modl.12716
  33. 10.4324/9781003270546-26
  34. 10.1016/j.system.2021.102470
  35. 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1979.tb01069.x
  36. 10.1075/lllt.16.11war
  37. 10.1515/9783110220964
  38. 10.2307/3588072
  39. 10.1016/j.system.2021.102475
CrossRef global citation count: 7 View in citation network →