Preserving the Figure

Written Communication Jan 2004

Jeanne Fahnestock University of Maryland, College Park

Abstract

Researchers studying science communication often examine how texts addressed to different audiences contribute to the formation of knowledge on a given issue. This article examines how arguments on scientific issues travel from text to text by considering how certain figures of speech persist from version to version. It uses a specialized genre of articles appearing in Science and Nature that introduces research reports appearing later in the issue. These pieces refer explicitly to a research report in the same issue, and in addition to their own agendas, re-present the researchers’ claims and supporting evidence. To investigate how the core of an argument survives, the expression claims and lines of support in epitomizing figures are compared. The articles sampled suggest that the figure antithesis, embodyingsingle-difference arguments,often persists from version to version. But in the process of perfecting a figured expression, arguments may be subtly changed in subsequent versions.

Journal: Written Communication
Published: 2004-01-01
DOI: 10.1177/0741088303261034
Open Access: Closed
Topics: scientific writing

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (12)

Falconer (2024)

The Discursive Boundary Work of Recontextualizing Science for Policy: Opening t…

Written Communication
Fahnestock (2020)

Verbal Signatures of Dissociation: Epitomizing and Limiting Cases

Philosophy & Rhetoric
Gigante (2015)

A Portrait of Exclusion: The Archetype of the Scientist at Work in Life …

Rhetoric Review
Luzón (2013)

Public Communication of Science in Blogs

Written Communication
Garwood (2013)

Metonymy and Plain Language

Journal of Technical Writing and Communication

Show all 12 →

Ross (2013)

Common Topics and Commonplaces of Environmental Rhetoric

Written Communication
Dyehouse (2009)

The CyberspaceIncrementum: Technology Development for Communicative Abundance

Rhetoric Society Quarterly
Hutto (2008)

Graphics and Ethos in Biomedical Journals

Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Ross (2008)

Dam Visuals: The Changing Visual Argument for the Glen Canyon Dam

Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Dyehouse (2007)

Knowledge Consolidation Analysis

Written Communication
Eisenhart (2006)

The Humanist Scholar as Public Expert

Written Communication
Journet (2005)

Metapahor, Ambiguity, and Motive in Evolutionary Biology

Written Communication

Cites in this index (3)

Rowan (1991)

When Simple Language Fails: Presenting Difficult Science to the Public

Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Rowan (1989)

Moving beyond the What to the Why: Differences in Professional an…

Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
FAHNESTOCK (1986)

Accommodating Science

Written Communication

Also cites 40 works outside this index ↓

10.1038/35081227

↗
10.1038/35082026

↗
10.1126/science.1057243

↗
10.1126/science.1056466

↗
10.1126/science.291.5501.109

↗
10.1038/35082667

↗
Brown, K. (2001). A discriminating taste for bitter. Science, 291, 1465-1466.

↗
10.1109/TPC.1982.6447803

↗
10.1177/016224398901400103

↗
Fahnestock, J. (1999). Rhetorical figures in science. New York: Oxford University Press.

↗
10.1126/science.291.5502.312

↗
10.1126/science.291.5505.889

↗
10.1126/science.1055465

↗
10.1126/science.291.5506.997

↗
10.1038/35082182

↗
10.1126/science.291.5511.2064

↗
10.1177/030631290020003006

↗
Kaiser, J. (2001). How rain pulses drive biome growth. Science, 291, 413-414.

↗
10.1038/35082075

↗
10.1126/science.291.5508.1469

↗
10.1126/science.291.5503.481

↗
Kucherlapati, R. & DePinho, R. A. (2001). Telomerase meets its match. Science, 291, 647-648.

↗
10.1177/030631295025003001

↗
10.1126/science.1059984

↗
10.1038/35082164

↗
10.1126/science.1058867

↗
Mill, J. S. (1874). A system of logic, ratiocinative and inductive, being a connected view of the principles …

↗
10.1038/35082594

↗
10.1177/1461445603005002006

↗
10.1126/science.1060025

↗
10.1038/35081034

↗
10.1126/science.1057179

↗
10.1126/science.10.1126/SCIENCE.1057253

↗
10.1038/35081224

↗
10.1126/science.291.5508.1506

↗
10.1126/science.1058249

↗
10.1126/science.1059318

↗
10.1177/1075547001023002005

↗
Whitley, R. (1985).Knowledge producers and knowledge acquirers: Popularisation as a relation between scientif…

↗
10.1126/science.1058773

↗

CrossRef global citation count: 23 View in citation network →