When Simple Language Fails: Presenting Difficult Science to the Public

Katherine E. Rowan Purdue University West Lafayette

Abstract

Explanatory tools such as simple words, examples, and analogies are ineffective for overcoming an important obstacle to understanding science. This obstacle is that many fundamental scientific principles are counterintuitive (e.g., people resist wearing seat belts partly because scientific notions of inertia are counterintuitive). To assist science writers in presenting science news and concepts, this article identified 1) three major difficulties lay readers often have in understanding science, 2) the kinds of ideas readers find counterintuitive, 3) ineffective approaches for explaining these notions, and 4) effective strategies that help people understand these difficult ideas and their implications for health and safety.

Journal
Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Published
1991-10-01
DOI
10.2190/d3bd-32rc-fgw0-c5jb
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (3)

  1. Technical Communication Quarterly
  2. Written Communication
  3. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication

References (50) · 4 in this index

  1. Scientists and Journalists: Reporting Science as News
  2. 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1985.tb01882.x
  3. Scientists and Journalists: Reporting Science as News
  4. 10.1038/340011a0
  5. 10.1080/0950069880100406
Show all 50 →
  1. Daedalus
  2. Scientists and Journalists: Reporting Science as News
  3. Comprehension Instruction
  4. The Meaning of Readability
  5. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  6. 10.2307/747483
  7. Written Communication
  8. 10.1002/sce.3730670210
  9. Understanding Expository Text
  10. 10.3102/00346543056001040
  11. 10.1037/0022-0663.81.2.240
  12. 10.1037/0022-0663.72.2.209
  13. 10.1037/0022-0663.80.4.524
  14. 10.1037/0022-0663.75.3.402
  15. 10.1177/107769908806500323
  16. Radio broadcast
  17. 10.2307/2136969
  18. 10.1177/109019818601300303
  19. Science
  20. 10.1002/tea.3660200804
  21. 10.1007/BF00051837
  22. Comprehension Instruction
  23. Journal of Reading
  24. McCloskey M., Intuitive Physics, Scientific American, pp. 122–130, April, 1983.
  25. 10.1002/sce.3730630113
  26. 10.1080/0140528840060409
  27. 10.1002/sce.3730720206
  28. 10.1080/03057268308559905
  29. 10.21236/ADA201093
  30. 10.1177/109019818401100210
  31. Writing and Reporting
  32. Reporting the Citizen's News: Public Affairs in Modern Society
  33. Presenting Science to the Public
  34. Science Education
  35. 10.1002/tea.3660230703
  36. 10.1080/0140528860080305
  37. McKinney J., The Lafayette [Ind.] Journal and Courier, p. A2, May 4, 1990.
  38. Impact of Science on Society
  39. 10.1177/107769908706400240
  40. 10.1177/107769589004500204
  41. Written Communication
  42. 10.1177/107769588904400403
  43. 10.37514/JBW-J.1989.8.2.03
  44. JTWC
  45. Written Communication