When Simple Language Fails: Presenting Difficult Science to the Public

Katherine E. Rowan Purdue University West Lafayette

Abstract

Explanatory tools such as simple words, examples, and analogies are ineffective for overcoming an important obstacle to understanding science. This obstacle is that many fundamental scientific principles are counterintuitive (e.g., people resist wearing seat belts partly because scientific notions of inertia are counterintuitive). To assist science writers in presenting science news and concepts, this article identified 1) three major difficulties lay readers often have in understanding science, 2) the kinds of ideas readers find counterintuitive, 3) ineffective approaches for explaining these notions, and 4) effective strategies that help people understand these difficult ideas and their implications for health and safety.

Journal
Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Published
1991-10-01
DOI
10.2190/d3bd-32rc-fgw0-c5jb
Open Access
Closed

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (3)

  1. Technical Communication Quarterly
  2. Written Communication
  3. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication

Cites in this index (3)

  1. Written Communication
  2. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  3. Written Communication
Also cites 28 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1985.tb01882.x
  2. 10.1038/340011a0
  3. 10.1080/0950069880100406
  4. 10.2307/747483
  5. 10.1002/sce.3730670210
  6. 10.3102/00346543056001040
  7. 10.1037/0022-0663.81.2.240
  8. 10.1037/0022-0663.72.2.209
  9. 10.1037/0022-0663.80.4.524
  10. 10.1037/0022-0663.75.3.402
  11. 10.1177/107769908806500323
  12. 10.2307/2136969
  13. 10.1177/109019818601300303
  14. 10.1002/tea.3660200804
  15. 10.1007/BF00051837
  16. McCloskey M., Intuitive Physics, Scientific American, pp. 122–130, April, 1983.
  17. 10.1002/sce.3730630113
  18. 10.1080/0140528840060409
  19. 10.1002/sce.3730720206
  20. 10.1080/03057268308559905
  21. 10.21236/ADA201093
  22. 10.1177/109019818401100210
  23. 10.1002/tea.3660230703
  24. 10.1080/0140528860080305
  25. 10.1177/107769908706400240
  26. 10.1177/107769589004500204
  27. 10.1177/107769588904400403
  28. 10.37514/JBW-J.1989.8.2.03
CrossRef global citation count: 21 View in citation network →