Abstract

Scientific popularizations are generally considered translations (often dubious ones) of scientific research for a lay audience. This study explores the role popularizations play within scientific discourse, specifically in the development of chaos theory. The methods included a review of the popular and the semipopular books on chaos theory from 1975 to 1995, interviews with key figures, and an analysis of the citations in scientific research journals to Gleick’s well-known popularization, Chaos: Making a New Science. The results indicate that popularizations take different forms as a scientific revolution develops into normal science. At various points, popularizations are used by scientists to find a broad, interdisciplinary, scientific audience, to show interest in the field, to disseminate lines of inquiry, and to help establish the author’s priority claim.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
2004-01-01
DOI
10.1177/0741088303261035
CompPile
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (5)

  1. Written Communication
  2. Technical Communication Quarterly
  3. Rhetoric Review
  4. Written Communication
  5. Technical Communication Quarterly

References (61) · 4 in this index

  1. 10.1086/285204
  2. American Institute of Physics. (1988). AIP in 1988: An annual report. Physics Today, 42(6), 47-58.
  3. 10.1016/0013-4694(90)90108-V
  4. Atkinson, D. (1999). Scientific discourse in sociohistorical context: The philosophical transactions of the R…
  5. Baker, G. L.& Gollub, J. P. (1990). Chaotic dynamics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Show all 61 →
  1. Bassingthwaighte, J. B. & van Beek, J. H. G. (1989). Lighting and the heart: Fractal behavior in cardiac func…
  2. Bazerman, C. (1989). Shaping written knowledge: The genre and activity of the experimental article in science…
  3. 10.1088/0963-6625/10/1/307
  4. 10.1007/BF02678443
  5. Campbell, J. A. (1987).Charles Darwin: Rhetorician of science. In J. Nelson, A. Megill, & D. McCloskey (Eds.)…
  6. Written Communication
  7. Cohen, J. & Stewart, I. (1994). The collapse of chaos. New York: Viking.
  8. 10.1109/31.1821
  9. Crutchfield, J. P., Farmer, J. D., Packard, N. H. & Shaw, R. S. (1986). Chaos. Scientific American, 255, 646-657.
  10. Darwin, C. (1958). Origins of the species (Mentor ed.). New York: Penguin.
  11. 10.1119/1.16163
  12. Fahnestock, J. (1993). Accommodating science: The rhetorical life of a scientific fact. In M. W. McRae (Ed.),…
  13. 10.1016/0956-7151(90)90300-6
  14. 10.1007/BF01020332
  15. Feigenbaum, M. J. (1980). Universal behavior in nonlinear systems. Los Alamos Science, 1, 4-27.
  16. Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P. & Trow, M. (1994). The new production of kn…
  17. Gleick, J. (1987). Chaos: Making a new science. New York: Penguin.
  18. Gregory, J. & Miller, S. (1998). Science in the public: Communication, culture and credibility. New York: Plenum.
  19. 10.1080/713695251
  20. 10.1177/1461445603005002005
  21. Harris, R. A. (1994). Assent, dissent, and rhetoric in science. In P. M. Dombrowski (Ed.), Humanistic aspects…
  22. 10.1016/S0167-2789(98)90014-8
  23. 10.1177/030631290020003006
  24. Horgan, J. (1996). The end of science. New York: Broadway Books.
  25. College Composition and Communication
  26. 10.1080/10417949209372863
  27. Kelley, R. T. (1993).Chaosout of order: The writerly discourse of semi-popular scientific texts.In M. W. McRa…
  28. Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  29. 10.2307/2318254
  30. Lightman, B. (1997). Constructing Victorian heavens: Agnes Clerke. In B. T. Gates & A. B. Shteir (Eds.), Natu…
  31. 10.1175/1520-0469(1963)020<0130:DNF>2.0.CO;2
  32. Lorenz, E. N. (1993). The essence of chaos. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
  33. Mandelbrot,B. B.(1975). Les objets fractals:Forme,hasard,etdimension. Paris:Flammarion.
  34. Mandelbrot, B. B. (1977). Fractals: Form, chance and dimension. New York: Freeman.
  35. Mandelbrot, B. B. (1983). The fractal nature of geometry. New York: Freeman.
  36. 10.1038/261459a0
  37. 10.1007/BF02017729
  38. Middleton, G. V. (1990). Nonlinear dynamics and chaos—Potential applications in the Earth sciences. Geoscienc…
  39. Miller, C. R. & Halloran, S. M. (1993). Reading Darwin, reading nature; or on the ethos of historical science…
  40. Myers, G. (1997). Fictionality, demonstration, and a forum for popular science: Jane Marcet’s Conversation on…
  41. 10.1177/1461445603005002006
  42. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  43. Written Communication
  44. Porush, D. S. (1993). Making chaos. Two views of a new science. In M. W. McRae (Ed.), The literature of scien…
  45. Prigogine, I. (1980). From being to becoming: Time and complexity in the physical sciences. New York: Freeman.
  46. Prigogine, I. & Stengers, I. (1979). La nouvelle alliance [The new alliance]. Paris: Gallimard.
  47. Prigogine, I. & Stengers, I. (1984). Order out of chaos: Man’s new dialogue with nature. Toronto, Canada: Ban…
  48. Prince, S. D. (1984). In the mind of Dr. Benoit Mandelbrot. Computer Pictures, 2(3), 46-52.
  49. Samardzija, N. & Greller, L. D. (1989). Explosive route to chaos through a fractal torus in a generalized Lot…
  50. 10.1119/1.16088
  51. Stewart, I. (1989). Does God play dice? The mathematics of chaos. London: Blackwell.
  52. 10.1021/ed066p187
  53. 10.2307/2322476
  54. Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univer…
  55. Toffler, A. (1984). Foreword: Science and change. In I. Prigogine & I. Stengers (Eds.), Order out of chaos: M…
  56. Winsor, D. (1993). Constructing scientific knowledge in Gould and Lewontin’s “The Spandrels of San Marco.” In…