Spreading Chaos

Danette Paul Brigham Young University

Abstract

Scientific popularizations are generally considered translations (often dubious ones) of scientific research for a lay audience. This study explores the role popularizations play within scientific discourse, specifically in the development of chaos theory. The methods included a review of the popular and the semipopular books on chaos theory from 1975 to 1995, interviews with key figures, and an analysis of the citations in scientific research journals to Gleick’s well-known popularization, Chaos: Making a New Science. The results indicate that popularizations take different forms as a scientific revolution develops into normal science. At various points, popularizations are used by scientists to find a broad, interdisciplinary, scientific audience, to show interest in the field, to disseminate lines of inquiry, and to help establish the author’s priority claim.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
2004-01-01
DOI
10.1177/0741088303261035
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (5)

  1. Written Communication
  2. Technical Communication Quarterly
  3. Rhetoric Review
  4. Written Communication
  5. Technical Communication Quarterly

Cites in this index (4)

  1. Written Communication
  2. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  3. Written Communication
  4. College Composition and Communication
Also cites 27 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1086/285204
  2. American Institute of Physics. (1988). AIP in 1988: An annual report. Physics Today, 42(6), 47-58.
  3. 10.1016/0013-4694(90)90108-V
  4. Bassingthwaighte, J. B. & van Beek, J. H. G. (1989). Lighting and the heart: Fractal behavior in cardiac func…
  5. 10.1088/0963-6625/10/1/307
  6. 10.1007/BF02678443
  7. 10.1109/31.1821
  8. Crutchfield, J. P., Farmer, J. D., Packard, N. H. & Shaw, R. S. (1986). Chaos. Scientific American, 255, 646-657.
  9. 10.1119/1.16163
  10. 10.1016/0956-7151(90)90300-6
  11. 10.1007/BF01020332
  12. 10.1080/713695251
  13. 10.1177/1461445603005002005
  14. Harris, R. A. (1994). Assent, dissent, and rhetoric in science. In P. M. Dombrowski (Ed.), Humanistic aspects…
  15. 10.1016/S0167-2789(98)90014-8
  16. 10.1177/030631290020003006
  17. 10.1080/10417949209372863
  18. 10.2307/2318254
  19. 10.1175/1520-0469(1963)020<0130:DNF>2.0.CO;2
  20. Lorenz, E. N. (1993). The essence of chaos. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
  21. 10.1038/261459a0
  22. 10.1007/BF02017729
  23. 10.1177/1461445603005002006
  24. Samardzija, N. & Greller, L. D. (1989). Explosive route to chaos through a fractal torus in a generalized Lot…
  25. 10.1119/1.16088
  26. 10.1021/ed066p187
  27. 10.2307/2322476
CrossRef global citation count: 18 View in citation network →