Abstract

Case studies of two proposals for research funding serve as examples of how scientific texts are the products of a community of researchers. Comparisons of successive versions of the proposals show that the two biologists, in revisions of their texts, alter their personae and their relations to the literature of their fields. In writing and rewriting, they both respond to and develop a disciplinary consensus.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
1985-07-01
DOI
10.1177/0741088385002003001
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (39)

  1. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  2. Written Communication
  3. Written Communication
  4. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  5. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Show all 39 →
  1. Written Communication
  2. Technical Communication Quarterly
  3. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  4. Written Communication
  5. Written Communication
  6. Technical Communication Quarterly
  7. Written Communication
  8. Written Communication
  9. Written Communication
  10. Written Communication
  11. Written Communication
  12. Written Communication
  13. Written Communication
  14. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  15. Written Communication
  16. Written Communication
  17. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  18. Technical Communication Quarterly
  19. Written Communication
  20. Technical Communication Quarterly
  21. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  22. Technical Communication Quarterly
  23. Written Communication
  24. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  25. Written Communication
  26. Written Communication
  27. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  28. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  29. Written Communication
  30. Written Communication
  31. Written Communication
  32. Written Communication
  33. Written Communication
  34. Written Communication

Cites in this index (1)

  1. Research in the Teaching of English
Also cites 7 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1007/BF02102317
  2. 10.1038/279575a0
  3. 10.1126/science.7302566
  4. 10.1038/scientificamerican1077-34
  5. 10.1126/science.1172294
  6. 10.1016/0018-506X(84)90047-3
  7. 10.1126/science.6867712
CrossRef global citation count: 85 View in citation network →