Abstract

To help students enter a professional discourse community, teachers must assess how accurately they both understand the community's discourse practices. Our research investigated how job recruiters seeking to fill positions in mechanical engineering or marketing were influenced by the quality of writing in student résumés. The résumés varied in elaboration, sentence style, mechanics, and amount of relevant work experience. The recruiters rated the résumés to indicate their willingness to interview the students. We found that recruiters in the two fields—engineering and marketing—valued quite different writing features. When we subsequently asked students in business writing and technical writing classes to rate the same résumés, we found that they underestimated the importance of various writing features. Generally, however, students' ratings resembled those of the recruiters in their respective disciplines. This study documents how students can improve their résumés and provides insight into the variations of discourse practices in professional disciplines.

Journal
Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Published
1992-01-01
DOI
10.1177/1050651992006001002
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (11)

  1. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  2. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  3. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  4. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  5. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
Show all 11 →
  1. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  2. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  3. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  4. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  5. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  6. Written Communication

References (34) · 5 in this index

  1. Writing in Nonacademic Settings
  2. Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review
  3. Understanding Scientific Prose
  4. JBTC
  5. Effective Documentation: What We Have Learned From Research
Show all 34 →
  1. 10.1016/S0002-8223(21)04127-4
    Journal of the American Dietetic Association  
  2. 10.1002/j.2164-585X.1976.tb00925.x
  3. Guidelines for Document Designers
  4. Written Communication
  5. 10.2307/376679
  6. 10.2307/377065
  7. 10.1002/j.2164-585X.1985.tb01109.x
  8. Research in the Teaching of English
  9. Business Communications: Principles and Methods
  10. Making Vocational Choices: A Theory of Careers
  11. Reporting Technical Information
  12. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  13. 10.2307/375964
  14. Written Communication
  15. Research in the Teaching of English
  16. Research in Technical Communication: A Bibliographic Sourcebook
  17. 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1982.tb02225.x
  18. 10.1177/002194368402100301
  19. Journal of Business Communication
  20. 10.2307/255665
  21. Introduction to Technical Writing
  22. Teaching Writers to Anticipate the Reader's Needs: A Classroom-Evaluated Pedagogy (Center…
  23. Constructing Rhetorical Education
  24. 10.1177/0893318989002004002
  25. 10.1177/0893318990004001005
  26. The Psychology of Careers
  27. Communication for Business and the Professions
  28. Style: Ten Lessons in Clarity and Grace
  29. Visible Language