Abstract

The authors assessed writing attitudes and epistemologies of 117 first-year and 329 upper-level undergraduates. Attitude scales assessed enjoyment of writing, self-ratings of writing ability, and belief in writing as learnable. Epistemological scales measured absolutism (belief in knowledge as determinably true or false), relativism (belief in the indeterminacy of all claims), and evaluativism (belief that truth can be approximated). Absolutism correlated negatively with writing grades and verbal aptitude, whereas evaluativism exhibited a weak positive correlation with both. Students with higher evaluativism tended to enjoy writing more and to assess themselves as good writers. Upper-level students were less absolutist and marginally more evaluativist than first-year students. Differences in attitudes and epistemologies emerged between men and women and among upper-level students in four disciplinary groups. The authors sketch some implications for writing pedagogy.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
1995-07-01
DOI
10.1177/0741088395012003004
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (5)

  1. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  2. Written Communication
  3. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  4. Written Communication
  5. Written Communication

Cites in this index (7)

  1. Research in the Teaching of English
  2. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  3. Written Communication
  4. Written Communication
  5. Research in the Teaching of English
Show all 7 →
  1. Research in the Teaching of English
  2. Research in the Teaching of English
Also cites 10 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1037/0003-066X.44.9.1175
  2. 10.1080/10862969309547826
  3. 10.1177/002221949302600404
  4. 10.1007/BF00991653
  5. 10.1016/0191-8869(94)90189-9
  6. Hearing ourselves think: Cognitive research in the college writing classroom
  7. 10.3102/00346543063002167
  8. 10.1037/0022-0663.82.3.498
  9. 10.1037/0022-0663.81.1.91
  10. 10.3102/00028312031004845
CrossRef global citation count: 20 View in citation network →