Abstract

This study examines how students enrolled in two Web-based sections of a technical writing class performed compared to students enrolled in a conventional version of the class. Although no significant difference in student performance was found between the two learning conditions, our data reveal intriguing relationships between students' prior knowledge, attitudes, and learning styles and our Web-based writing environment. One finding that we focus on is that reflective, global learners performed significantly better online than active, sequential learners, whereas there was no difference between them in the conventional class. Our study highlights the complexity of effective teaching and the difficulty of making comparisons between the online and the classroom environments. In particular, we maintain that the transfer of active learning strategies to the Web is not straightforward and that interactivity as a goal of instructional Web site design requires significant elaboration.

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Published
2000-06-01
DOI
10.1109/47.843644
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication

Cites in this index (12)

  1. College English
  2. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  3. Written Communication
  4. Written Communication
  5. Computers and Composition
Show all 12 →
  1. Computers and Composition
  2. Written Communication
  3. Written Communication
  4. Computers and Composition
  5. Written Communication
  6. Written Communication
  7. Written Communication
Also cites 20 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1145/311147.311148
  2. 10.1080/08923649109526758
  3. 10.1126/science.270.5234.247
  4. 10.1145/280449.280454
  5. 10.1002/j.2168-9830.1995.tb00191.x
  6. 10.1002/j.2168-9830.1997.tb00287.x
  7. how do learning styles relate to performance in a computer applications course?
    J Res Computing in Educ  
  8. 10.1111/j.1083-6101.1997.tb00201.x
  9. 10.1518/001872098779480505
  10. 10.1353/pmc.1994.0058
  11. 10.1007/BF00956756
  12. 10.1109/IPCC.1998.722084
  13. 10.1177/002194369703400106
  14. 10.1016/0747-5632(87)90010-0
  15. 10.1207/s15327051hci0703_1
  16. 10.1080/00091383.1996.9937750
  17. 10.7208/chicago/9780226469126.001.0001
  18. 10.1002/j.2168-9830.1998.tb00350.x
  19. 10.1145/296336.296391
  20. 10.1109/IPCC.1994.347521