Grammatical Versus Pragmatic Error

Abstract

Many communication instructors make allowances for grammatical error in nonnative English speakers’ writing, but do businesspeople do the same? We asked 169 businesspeople to comment on three versions of an email with different types of errors. We found that businesspeople do make allowances for errors made by nonnative English speakers, perceiving these errors as less bothersome than those made by native speakers. We also found that businesspeople perceive pragmatic errors of politeness and tone as even more bothersome than grammatical error—a finding we share with our students to persuade them of the importance of polite and professional email correspondence.

Journal
Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
Published
2016-12-01
DOI
10.1177/2329490616671133
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (7)

  1. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  2. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  3. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  4. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  5. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
Show all 7 →
  1. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  2. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly

Cites in this index (3)

  1. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  2. The WAC Journal
  3. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Also cites 19 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.2307/359061
  2. 10.1177/003368829802900206
  3. 10.1016/j.pragma.2011.06.006
  4. 10.1075/pbns.217.04fel
  5. 10.1177/002194360103800403
  6. 10.1163/9789004368811_003
  7. 10.2307/376679
  8. 10.1016/1060-3743(92)90011-D
  9. 10.1177/002194369002700202
  10. 10.1016/S0889-4906(05)80009-2
  11. 10.18806/tesl.v26i1.129
  12. 10.1016/j.jslw.2007.10.002
  13. 10.1016/j.system.2005.06.003
  14. 10.1016/S1060-3743(97)90031-X
  15. 10.2307/3587062
  16. 10.1017/CBO9781139173438
  17. 10.1016/S1060-3743(96)90023-5
  18. 10.2307/3586713
  19. 10.1177/108056990206500406
CrossRef global citation count: 25 View in citation network →