Abstract

We investigated the perception and recognition of errors in a population of practitioners and academics in professional and technical communication. Specifically, we measured 303 participants’ botheration levels of 24 usage errors and then correlated those results against their ability to recognize the errors. Results indicated that practitioners were often more bothered by errors than academics and that participants’ overall botheration level might have fluctuated over the past 40 years. Participants’ botheration level also appeared to associate with their ability to identify error. Finally, we found that participants’ gender, job type, and years working in the field influence their error perception.

Journal
Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
Published
2018-12-01
DOI
10.1177/2329490618803740
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (4)

  1. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  2. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  3. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  4. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly

Cites in this index (3)

  1. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  2. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  3. College Composition and Communication
Also cites 11 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.2307/359061
  2. 10.1109/TPC.2013.2287570
  3. 10.2307/357695
  4. 10.1177/002194360103800403
  5. 10.37514/JBW-J.2003.22.1.07
  6. 10.2307/376679
  7. 10.1109/IPCC.2014.7020345
  8. 10.1177/002194369002700202
  9. 10.1093/hcr/27.1.121
  10. 10.1080/01638530802073712
  11. 10.2307/356689
CrossRef global citation count: 11 View in citation network →