Abstract

We investigated the perception and recognition of errors in a population of practitioners and academics in professional and technical communication. Specifically, we measured 303 participants’ botheration levels of 24 usage errors and then correlated those results against their ability to recognize the errors. Results indicated that practitioners were often more bothered by errors than academics and that participants’ overall botheration level might have fluctuated over the past 40 years. Participants’ botheration level also appeared to associate with their ability to identify error. Finally, we found that participants’ gender, job type, and years working in the field influence their error perception.

Journal
Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
Published
2018-12-01
DOI
10.1177/2329490618803740
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (6)

  1. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  2. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  3. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  4. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  5. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Show all 6 →
  1. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly

References (29) · 4 in this index

  1. The handbook of technical writing
  2. Technical editing in the 21st century
  3. 10.2307/359061
  4. Boettger R. K. (2011). Examining error in the technical communication editing test. In Proceedings of the Tec…
  5. American Medical Writers Association Journal
Show all 29 →
  1. Technical Communication
  2. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  3. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  4. 10.2307/357695
  5. Style and sociolinguistic variation
  6. American English grammar: The grammatical structure of present-day American English with …
  7. 10.1177/002194360103800403
  8. 10.37514/JBW-J.2003.22.1.07
  9. The technical communication handbook
  10. 10.2307/376679
  11. Kantz M., Yates R. (1994). Whose judgments? A survey of faculty responses to common and highly irritating wri…
  12. 10.1109/IPCC.2014.7020345
  13. 10.1177/002194369002700202
  14. Business and administrative communication
  15. College Composition and Communication
  16. The everyday writer with exercises with 2009 MLA and 2010 APA updates
  17. 10.1093/hcr/27.1.121
  18. 10.1080/01638530802073712
  19. Grammar and the teaching of writing: Limits and possibilities
  20. Editing for writers
  21. Technical editing
  22. Writing at work: Professional writing skills for people on the job
  23. 10.2307/356689
  24. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly