Testing the Recognition and Perception of Errors in Context

Abstract

This study tests the recognition of errors in context and whether the presence of errors affects the reader’s perception of the writer’s ethos. In an experimental, posttest only design, participants were randomly assigned a memo to read in an online survey: one version with errors and one version without. Of the six intentional errors in version one, on average, readers only noticed two errors, which suggests that readers notice some but not all errors. The ethos ranking for the writer was also statistically significant between the two versions, suggesting that the presence of errors can affect the writer’s ethos.

Journal
Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
Published
2015-03-01
DOI
10.1177/2329490614563570
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (8)

  1. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  2. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  3. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  4. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  5. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
Show all 8 →
  1. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  2. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  3. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly

Cites in this index (5)

  1. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  2. College Composition and Communication
  3. College Composition and Communication
  4. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  5. College Composition and Communication
Also cites 9 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.2307/359061
  2. 10.2307/357695
  3. 10.2307/376679
  4. 10.1177/002194368902600204
  5. 10.1177/002194369002700202
  6. 10.1109/47.649554
  7. 10.1080/10510978109368075
  8. 10.1177/108056990206500406
  9. 10.2307/356689
CrossRef global citation count: 11 View in citation network →