Abstract

Workplace learning initiatives are influenced by perceptions, and negative perceptions hinder organizational innovation and productivity. This exploratory study presents an argument that messages shared among trainees regarding their training experiences shape such perceptions. The application of Symbolic Convergence Theory reveals two discursive narratives explaining trainees’ perceptions that are foundational for a desired rhetorical vision of training efforts. The findings reveal practical implications for teaching applied communication and instruction in the workplace training classroom. Further, exploring “backstage” workplace communication such as gossip, opinions, and perceptions sheds light on the intersection of communication, human resource development, and vision construction.

Journal
Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
Published
2023-06-01
DOI
10.1177/23294906221132840
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (7)

  1. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  2. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  3. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  4. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  5. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
Show all 7 →
  1. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  2. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Also cites 41 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1002/hrdq.21404
  2. 10.1002/hrdq.21282
  3. 10.1080/00335637409383220
  4. 10.1080/17459435.2014.955593
  5. 10.2307/293432
  6. 10.1080/00335637309383163
  7. 10.1080/00335637709383374
  8. 10.1080/10510979709368504
  9. 10.1002/hrdq.21308
  10. 10.1177/1534484307299273
  11. Burke L. A., Hutchins H. M. (2008). A study of best practices in training transfer and proposed model of tran…
  12. 10.1080/13678860601170344
  13. 10.1080/00909889209365329
  14. 10.1080/03634523.2014.934849
  15. 10.1108/10878570610637885
  16. 10.1080/10417949709373046
  17. 10.1177/0018726700539005
  18. 10.1002/hrdq.1243
  19. 10.1002/hrdq.20086
  20. 10.1080/03634523.2016.1268697
  21. 10.1080/03634529509378996
  22. 10.1080/03634523.2018.1536271
  23. 10.1177/1049732316665344
  24. 10.1177/2329488417743983
  25. 10.1080/17459435.2016.1143386
  26. 10.1108/ICT-04-2015-0029
  27. 10.1177/002194360103800404
  28. 10.1108/17465640710749108
  29. 10.1080/03634520802324116
  30. 10.1002/hrdq.21203
  31. 10.1080/1041794X.2014.981284
  32. 10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8
  33. 10.1080/08824090802637023
  34. 10.1108/JWL-05-2020-0096
  35. 10.1080/03634523.2018.1428761
  36. 10.4135/9781412995658
  37. 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.11.081
  38. 10.1080/03634523.2019.1646919
  39. 10.1080/03634520701573284
  40. 10.1002/pa.72
  41. 10.1080/03634520801930095
CrossRef global citation count: 1 View in citation network →