Abstract

Background: Undergraduate engineering students often receive insufficient support when crafting résumés. Most notably, there is often a lack of disciplinary-specific instruction and a lack of emphasis on the persuasive function of résumés. Ultimately seeking to strengthen instructional materials, this study investigates a way to quantify the quality of engineering résumés, focusing specifically on the use of disciplinary discourse. Research questions: How do engineering résumés exhibit disciplinary discourse? How can disciplinary discourse be quantified as a way of promoting strong engineering résumé writing and professional development skills? Literature review: This project builds on research exploring the qualities of effective résumés. It extends on work establishing disciplinary differences in desired résumé qualities, as well as work characterizing résumé writing as an opportunity for professional identity development. Grounded in activity theory, this project seeks to elucidate the “rules” of effective engineering résumés at the lexical level. Methodology: This project analyzed a corpus of 31 engineering résumés through both qualitative and quantitative means. Résumés were initially ranked via a rubric, then coded for disciplinary discourse according to the American Association of Engineering Societies' Engineering Competency Model. Disciplinary discourse scores were then analyzed through descriptive statistics. Results and conclusion: Significant differences in the use of disciplinary discourse were found among strong, moderate, and weak résumés. Though these results are not generalizable due to the small corpus size, they indicate that disciplinary discourse may be a fruitful area for future research on résumés and the development of pedagogical materials.

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Published
2018-03-01
DOI
10.1109/tpc.2017.2747338
CompPile
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (7)

  1. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  2. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  3. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  4. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  5. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
Show all 7 →
  1. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  2. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication

References (48) · 16 in this index

  1. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  2. 10.1177/1461445609356499
  3. 10.1016/j.esp.2007.07.006
  4. Introduction
    Routledge Handbook of English for Academic Purposes
  5. 10.2307/1503316
Show all 48 →
  1. 10.1080/02691728708578446
  2. 10.1016/j.esp.2006.10.001
  3. 10.1023/A:1003216613001
  4. 10.1075/swll.5
  5. 10.1017/9781009406512
    Disciplinary Identities  
  6. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  7. Engineering by the numbers
  8. Designing the technical communication resume
    Tech Commun
  9. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  10. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  11. A co-op approach to writing résumés and letters of application
    Tech Commun
  12. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  13. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  14. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  15. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  16. Technical Communication Quarterly
  17. 10.1177/004839318101100305
  18. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  19. Learning by Expanding
  20. Writing Center Journal
  21. How to write a resume
    Tech Commun
  22. 10.2190/NETC8
  23. Writing Center Journal
  24. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  25. Teaching the resume as a technical document
    Tech Commun
  26. Writing Center Journal
  27. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  28. Writing Center Journal
  29. 10.1017/CBO9780511803932
  30. 10.1002/j.2168-9830.1998.tb00392.x
  31. Learning in Landscapes of Practice Boundaries Identity and Knowledgeability in Practice-Based Learning
  32. Résumés in the development of undergraduate engineering identity: A genre a…
  33. 10.1002/j.2168-9830.1996.tb00238.x
  34. 10.1109/FIE.2016.7757711
  35. 10.1002/j.2168-9830.1996.tb00255.x
  36. Content Analysis An Introduction to Its Methodology
  37. 10.1002/j.2168-9830.1995.tb00139.x
  38. 10.1002/j.2168-9830.1995.tb00165.x
  39. Basics of Qualitative Research
  40. 10.18260/p.24784
  41. Competency model
  42. Minority students severely underrepresented in science, technology engineering and math
    J STEM Educ