Abstract

Background: The lab report is a commonly assigned genre in engineering lab courses; however, students often have difficulties meeting the expectations of writing in engineering labs. At the same time, it is challenging for engineering faculty to instruct lab report writing because they are often under-supported in writing pedagogies and usually unfamiliar with the extent of students' prior writing knowledge. Literature review: Literature on technical communication in engineering addresses the importance of a rhetorical approach to writing instruction, as well as an emphasis on genre. Extending this literature, research into writing transfer provides valuable insight for better understanding how undergraduates negotiate the engineering lab report as a new genre within this distinct rhetorical context. Research questions: 1. How effective is a transfer-focused writing pedagogy in supporting students' understanding of the genre conventions of engineering lab reports? 2. How does the transfer-focused writing pedagogy impact students' writing quality in five categories (rhetorical knowledge, organization, evidence, critical thinking, and disciplinary conventions)? 3. What are the rhetorical features that engineering students improve or struggle with the most with lab report writing? Research methodology: Four engineering instructors and two English instructors participated in this study to design and develop the lab report writing instructional module, and implemented the module materials into their engineering lab courses. The module, consisting of lab report writing instruction and assessment resources, shares a rhetorical approach and foundational writing terms with first-year composition courses to emphasize a writing-transfer pedagogy. We collected and analyzed undergraduates' lab report samples to evaluate the impact of the module on students' writing performance. Two sets of lab reports were collected for analysis: the sample sets before (control), during the 2015-2016 academic year; and after (experimental) implementation of the module, during the 2016-2017 academic year. Results and conclusions: Data collected via pre- and post-implementation writing artifacts show that a rhetorical approach to teaching lab reports helped students better understand the expectations of the lab report as a discipline-specific genre, and it developed students' understanding of the rhetorical features of engineering writing. The pilot module positively impacted the quality of students' lab reports, a finding that suggests that using a transfer-focused writing pedagogy can successfully support the transfer and adaptation of writing knowledge into gateway or entry-level engineering laboratory courses.

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Published
2020-03-01
DOI
10.1109/tpc.2019.2961009
CompPile
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (6)

  1. Computers and Composition
  2. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  3. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  4. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  5. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Show all 6 →
  1. College Composition and Communication

References (60) · 20 in this index

  1. Assembling knowledge: The role of threshold concepts in facilitating transfer
    Critical Transitions Writing and the Question of Transfer  
  2. 10.2307/j.ctt6wrr95
  3. Written Communication
  4. Learning theories An educational perspective
  5. Transfer of learning
    International Encyclopedia of Education
Show all 60 →
  1. 10.31468/cjsdwr.524
  2. Assessing Writing
  3. Agents of Integration Understanding Transfer as a Rhetorical Act
  4. College Composition and Communication
  5. College Writing and Beyond A New Framework for University Writing Instruction
  6. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  7. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  8. 10.1080/00335638409383686
  9. Teaching critical genre awareness
    Genre in A Changing World
  10. 10.1002/j.2168-9830.1996.tb00205.x
  11. 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2010.tb01072.x
  12. Writing in the Academic Disciplines A Curricular History
  13. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  14. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  15. ‘Filling to capacity’: An exploratory study of project management language …
    Tech Commun
  16. Technical Communication Quarterly
  17. Wpa outcomes statement for first-year composition (3.0), approved July 17, 2014
  18. Technical Communication Quarterly
  19. 10.18260/1-2--27915
  20. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  21. 10.1017/CBO9781139524827
  22. 10.4324/9781410609526
  23. Assessing Student Learning A Common Sense Guide
  24. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  25. Genre Analysis English in Academic and Research Settings
  26. Writing transfer in engineering
  27. Assigning Responding Evaluating A Writing Teacher's Guide
  28. Connecting the curriculum: Designing WID programs for the 21st century
    Proc Int Writing Across Curriculum Conf
  29. Efficacy of lab reports for electric circuits laboratory assessment
    ASEE Annu Conf Expo Conf Proc
  30. Improving the quality of writing in a capstone engineering design course
    Proc ASEE Annu Conf Expo
  31. College Composition and Communication
  32. How to build better engineers: A practice approach to the mechanics of text
    The Quarterly of the National Writing Project
  33. Measuring writing as a representation of discplinary knowledge
    International Journal of Process Education
  34. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  35. Supporting lab report writing in an introductory materials engineering lab
    Proc Amer Soc Eng Educ Annu Conf Expo
  36. Developing inquiry-based laboratory exercises for a mechanical engineering curriculum
    Proc of American Soc for Eng Edu Annual Conf
  37. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  38. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  39. Writing Like an Engineer A Rhetorical Education
  40. 10.2307/40252171
  41. 10.1353/rhe.2012.0035
  42. Criteria for accrediting engineering programs, 2018-2019
  43. Research in the Teaching of English
  44. Learning objectives for engineering education laboratories
    Proc of the ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Educ Conf
  45. 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2007.tb00922.x
  46. WAC and engineering, or why engineers can't write
    Proc 42nd Annu Meet Conf Coll Comp Commun
  47. 10.1016/j.esp.2016.08.001
  48. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  49. LabWrite: Extensive web-based instruction for helping college students write lab reports …
    Proc 26th Workshop/Conf Assoc Biol Lab Educ
  50. The WAC Journal
  51. College Composition and Communication
  52. Dynamic transfer in first-year writing and ‘Writing in the disciplines’ settings
    Critical Transitions Writing and the Question of Transfer  
  53. 10.7330/9780874219401
  54. 10.1187/cbe.10-10-0127
  55. Across the Disciplines