Engineering Students’ Writing Perceptions Impact Their Conceptual Learning

Madalyn Wilson-Fetrow University of New Mexico ; Vanessa Svihla University of New Mexico ; Eva Chi ; Catherine Hubka University of New Mexico ; Yan Chen University of Nevada, Las Vegas

Abstract

<bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Background:</b> Technical writing is a critical professional skill for engineers, but engineering students often perceive writing as less important. <bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Literature review:</b> Research suggests feedback, revision, and reflective writing support conceptual learning. However, just as student beliefs about intelligence impact engagement and learning outcomes, beliefs about writing may likewise affect how valuable writing is to learning. <bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Research questions:</b> 1. Do student beliefs—expressed in reflections—depict writing as a learning process or as a deterministic artifact? 2. To what extent do these expressed beliefs explain variance in their conceptual learning in a chemical engineering laboratory course? <bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Research methodology:</b> A design-based research study was conducted in three semesters of an upper division chemical engineering laboratory course to jointly study the use of feedback, revision, and reflection, and to develop contextualized theory about the relationships between these and students’ conceptual learning. Students’ writing was analyzed qualitatively. Regression modelling explained variance in scores of students’ conceptual understanding. <bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Results:</b> We found that students who elaborated on errors and corrections scored significantly lower on conceptual understanding in their final submission, while students who described writing as an ongoing process scored significantly higher on conceptual understanding in their final reports. We found a similar trend for students who completed a second cycle, and especially that a focus on perfecting a written artifact corresponded to lesser gains. <bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Conclusions:</b> Our findings lend support for assisting engineering students to approach writing as a developmental and learning process and for engaging them in multiple rounds of feedback, revision, and reflection across their programs of study.

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Published
2023-06-01
DOI
10.1109/tpc.2023.3251159
CompPile
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (82) · 12 in this index

  1. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  2. 10.1007/s10798-015-9341-0
  3. 10.18260/1-2--32061
  4. Internet Mail and Mixed-Mode Surveys The Tailored Design Method
  5. Student perceptions of communication: Undergraduate engineers? Views of writing and speak…
    J STEM Educ
Show all 82 →
  1. White privilege: Unpacking the invisible knapsack
  2. 10.18260/1-2--17621
  3. &#x2018;Underrepresented minority&#x2019; considered harmful, racist language
    BLOG CACM
  4. 10.1207/s15326985ep3904_3
  5. 10.14786/flr.v2i4.114
  6. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  7. 10.18260/1-2--33529
  8. Teaching technical writing in a lab course in chemical engineering
    Chem Eng Educ
  9. 10.1002/jee.20368
  10. Grading students' classroom writing: Issues and strategies
  11. 10.18260/1-2--33246
  12. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  13. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  14. 10.3102/0013189X032001005
  15. 10.1207/s15327809jls0202_2
  16. Research in the Teaching of English
  17. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  18. Writing attitudes and career trajectories of domestic and international students in the U…
    International Journal of Electrical Engineering Education IJEE
  19. 10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000247
  20. 10.1109/ProComm.2018.00037
  21. 10.18260/1-2--33479
  22. 10.18260/1-2--18847
  23. 10.1109/EDUCON.2018.8363231
  24. 10.1080/03043797.2017.1405241
  25. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  26. 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2008.tb00995.x
  27. 10.18260/1-2--30467
  28. Criteria for accrediting engineering programs, 2020-2021
  29. All a chemical engineer does is write
    Chem Eng Educ
  30. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  31. &#x2018;It's not my job to teach writing&#x2019;: Activity theory analysis of [invisible]…
    Journal of Academic Language and Learning
  32. 10.18260/1-2--32019
  33. 10.18260/1-2--34077
  34. 10.1039/C7RP00244K
  35. Improving student writing through effective feedback: Best practices and recommendations
    J Teaching Writing
  36. 10.1007/S40037-018-0479-9
  37. 10.3102/0034654307313795
  38. 10.1007/s10459-008-9124-4
  39. 10.1080/07294360.2019.1657807
  40. 10.1002/jee.20187
  41. 10.1080/00461520.2012.722805
  42. 10.1007/s11251-017-9420-6
  43. 10.18260/1-2--29986
  44. 10.1039/D1RP00181G
  45. 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00833.x
  46. 10.1080/23752696.2019.1710550
  47. 10.18260/1-2?30866
  48. 10.1002/jee.20452
  49. 10.18260/1-2--30633
  50. 10.1109/WIE.2017.8285605
  51. 10.18260/1-2--18809
  52. 10.1007/s10648-015-9355-x
  53. Understanding how engineering identity and belongingness predict grit for first-generatio…
    Proc Collaborative Netw Eng Comput Diversity Conf
  54. Experiential Learning Experience as the Source of Learning and Development
  55. 10.1080/1360144X.2019.1659797
  56. 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2003.tb00735.x
  57. 10.1080/14703290903525911
  58. 10.1557/s43579-021-00114-z
  59. 10.1177/1098214005283748
  60. Handbook of Writing Research
  61. The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers
  62. 10.1039/D1RP00301A
  63. 10.1109/FIE.2014.7044302
  64. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  65. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  66. 10.1207/S15324818AME1302_1
  67. 10.1016/j.edurev.2007.05.002
  68. 10.1039/C8RP00260F
  69. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  70. Using reflective writing and textual explanations to evaluate students&#x2019; conceptual…
    Austral Assoc Eng Educ
  71. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  72. Short writing assignments within a laboratory course to improve understanding and interes…
    Proc ASEE Annu Conf Expo
  73. 10.18260/1-2--23184
  74. 10.1109/ICSE.2015.178
  75. 10.1002/jee.20290
  76. 10.18260/1-2--36797
  77. Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering