Engineering Students’ Writing Perceptions Impact Their Conceptual Learning

Madalyn Wilson-Fetrow; Vanessa Svihla; Eva Chi; Catherine Hubka; Yan Chen

doi:10.1109/tpc.2023.3251159

IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication Jun 2023

Engineering Students’ Writing Perceptions Impact Their Conceptual Learning

Madalyn Wilson-Fetrow University of New Mexico ; Vanessa Svihla University of New Mexico ; Eva Chi ; Catherine Hubka University of New Mexico ; Yan Chen University of Nevada, Las Vegas

Abstract

<bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Background: Technical writing is a critical professional skill for engineers, but engineering students often perceive writing as less important. <bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Literature review: Research suggests feedback, revision, and reflective writing support conceptual learning. However, just as student beliefs about intelligence impact engagement and learning outcomes, beliefs about writing may likewise affect how valuable writing is to learning. <bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Research questions: 1. Do student beliefs—expressed in reflections—depict writing as a learning process or as a deterministic artifact? 2. To what extent do these expressed beliefs explain variance in their conceptual learning in a chemical engineering laboratory course? <bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Research methodology: A design-based research study was conducted in three semesters of an upper division chemical engineering laboratory course to jointly study the use of feedback, revision, and reflection, and to develop contextualized theory about the relationships between these and students’ conceptual learning. Students’ writing was analyzed qualitatively. Regression modelling explained variance in scores of students’ conceptual understanding. <bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Results: We found that students who elaborated on errors and corrections scored significantly lower on conceptual understanding in their final submission, while students who described writing as an ongoing process scored significantly higher on conceptual understanding in their final reports. We found a similar trend for students who completed a second cycle, and especially that a focus on perfecting a written artifact corresponded to lesser gains. <bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Conclusions: Our findings lend support for assisting engineering students to approach writing as a developmental and learning process and for engaging them in multiple rounds of feedback, revision, and reflection across their programs of study.

Journal: IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Published: 2023-06-01
DOI: 10.1109/tpc.2023.3251159
CompPile: Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access: Closed
Topics: revision technical communication affect and writing
Export: BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (12)

Kim et al. (2020)

Using a Transfer-Focused Writing Pedagogy to Improve Undergraduates’ Lab Report…

IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Buswell et al. (2019)

Engineering Instructors on Writing: Perceptions, Practices, and Needs

IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Zemliansky et al. (2017)

A Writing-Across-the-Curriculum Faculty Development Program: An Experience Report

IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Yoshizawa et al. (2012)

Assessing the Impact of Student Peer Review in Writing Instruction by Using the…

IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Boettger (2010)

Rubric Use in Technical Communication: Exploring the Process of Creating Valid …

IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication

Show all 12 →

Leydens (2008)

Novice and Insider Perspectives on Academic and Workplace Writing: Toward a Con…

IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Ford (2004)

Knowledge Transfer Across Disciplines: Tracking RhetoricalStrategies From a Tec…

IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Walker (1999)

Using genre theory to teach students engineering lab report writing: a collabor…

IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Pierson et al. (1997)

Beginnings and endings: keys to better engineering technical writing

IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Herrington (1985)

Writing in Academic Settings: A Study of the Contexts for Writing in Two Colleg…

Research in the Teaching of English
Barnum (1982)

Teaching technical writing to the engineering student: Industry's needs, the st…

IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Michaelson (1974)

The incremental method of writing engineering papers

IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication

Also cites 52 works outside this index ↓

10.1007/s10798-015-9341-0

↗
10.18260/1-2--32061

↗
10.18260/1-2--17621

↗
10.1207/s15326985ep3904_3

↗
10.14786/flr.v2i4.114

↗
10.18260/1-2--33529

↗
10.1002/jee.20368

↗
10.18260/1-2--33246

↗
10.3102/0013189X032001005

↗
10.1207/s15327809jls0202_2

↗
10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000247

↗
10.1109/ProComm.2018.00037

↗
10.18260/1-2--33479

↗
10.18260/1-2--18847

↗
10.1109/EDUCON.2018.8363231

↗
10.1080/03043797.2017.1405241

↗
10.1002/j.2168-9830.2008.tb00995.x

↗
10.18260/1-2--30467

↗
10.18260/1-2--32019

↗
10.18260/1-2--34077

↗
10.1039/C7RP00244K

↗
10.1007/S40037-018-0479-9

↗
10.3102/0034654307313795

↗
10.1007/s10459-008-9124-4

↗
10.1080/07294360.2019.1657807

↗
10.1002/jee.20187

↗
10.1080/00461520.2012.722805

↗
10.1007/s11251-017-9420-6

↗
10.18260/1-2--29986

↗
10.1039/D1RP00181G

↗
10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00833.x

↗
10.1080/23752696.2019.1710550

↗
10.18260/1-2?30866

↗
10.1002/jee.20452

↗
10.18260/1-2--30633

↗
10.1109/WIE.2017.8285605

↗
10.18260/1-2--18809

↗
10.1007/s10648-015-9355-x

↗
10.1080/1360144X.2019.1659797

↗
10.1002/j.2168-9830.2003.tb00735.x

↗
10.1080/14703290903525911

↗
10.1557/s43579-021-00114-z

↗
10.1177/1098214005283748

↗
10.1039/D1RP00301A

↗
10.1109/FIE.2014.7044302

↗
10.1207/S15324818AME1302_1

↗
10.1016/j.edurev.2007.05.002

↗
10.1039/C8RP00260F

↗
10.18260/1-2--23184

↗
10.1109/ICSE.2015.178

↗
10.1002/jee.20290

↗
10.18260/1-2--36797

↗

CrossRef global citation count: 1 View in citation network → Build reading path →

Engineering Students’ Writing Perceptions Impact Their Conceptual Learning

Abstract

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

Cites in this index (12)

Related Articles