Abstract

Background: Practitioners, academics, and accrediting boards all recognize the importance of communication to the work of engineers, but ensuring that engineering students graduate with effective communication skills continues to be a challenge for programs. Our project examines this problem within our institutional context, with the goal of serving local needs while extending the literature on engineering communication. Literature review: Prior research identifies communication skill gaps, examines the effectiveness of various approaches to teaching engineering communication, and highlights issues of knowledge transfer. Few studies collect both academic and practitioner perspectives. Research questions: 1. How effectively does the required first-year course provide students with foundational engineering communication skills? 2. How much do students’ communication abilities improve by the time they complete the engineering capstone course in their final semester? 3. To what extent are engineering students graduating with the communication skills they will need to succeed professionally? Research methodology: This study involved technical and professional communication instructors’ analysis of student communication work from two courses: 1. first-year engineering communication and 2. the engineering capstone. The study also included surveys of and follow-up interviews with engineering practitioners regarding the communication skills of capstone students and recent engineering graduates more generally. Results: Student work from the first-year engineering communication course was weak; communication work from the capstone was not substantially stronger, even though students were provided with a detailed template for each assignment. The survey and interviews suggest that practitioners tended to view capstone students’ communication skills favorably but found the skills of new hires who were recent graduates to be weaker. Conclusions: The data emphasize the shortcomings of stand-alone communication courses, issues with knowledge transfer, and the role of institutional contexts.

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
10.1109/tpc.2025.3607170
CompPile
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (23) · 6 in this index

  1. Criteria for accrediting engineering programs, 20242025, Criterion 3
  2. Board 40: Understanding industrys expectations of engineering communication skills
  3. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  4. 10.1002/jee.20161
  5. An exploratory study of engineering students misconceptions about technical communication
Show all 23 →
  1. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  2. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  3. Writing objectively: Functional grammar as a tool to improve engineering students writing style
  4. When students resist: Ethnography of a senior design experience in engineering education
    Int. J. Eng. Edu.
  5. Enhancement of students technical writing through a combination of classroom activities
  6. An integrated approach to developing technical communication skills in engineering students
  7. Integrating communication into engineering curricula: An interdisciplinary approach to fa…
    Comp. Forum
  8. 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2008.tb00995.x
  9. 10.1177/0162243913504305
  10. 10.1080/03634523.2019.1608367
  11. Teaching engineering students to communicate effectively: A metacognitive approach
    Int. J. Eng. Edu.
  12. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  13. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  14. Transitioning from capstone design courses to workplaces: A study of new engineers first …
    Int. J. Eng. Educ.
  15. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  16. 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2003.tb00776.x
  17. How student written communication skills benefit during participation in an industry-spon…
    Adv. Eng. Educ.
  18. 10.1109/ProComm57838.2023.00016