Abstract

Interdisciplinary collaborations to help students compose for discipline-specific contexts draw on multiple expertise. Science, technology, education, and mathematics (STEM) programs particularly rely on their writing colleagues because 1) their academic expertise is often not writing and 2) teaching writing often necessitates a redesigning of existing instructional materials. While many writing studies scholars have the expertise to assist their STEM colleagues with such tasks, how to do so—and, more fundamentally, how to begin such efforts—is not commonly focused on in the literature stemming from these collaborations. Our article addresses this gap by detailing an interdisciplinary Writing in the Disciplines (WID) collaboration at a large, public R1 university between STEM and writing experts to redesign the university’s introductory biology writing curriculum. The collaborative curriculum design process detailed here is presented through the lens of wayfinding, which concerns orientation, trailblazing, and moving through uncertain landscapes according to cues. Within this account, a critical focus on language—what we talk about when we talk about writing—emerges, driving both the collaboration itself and resultant curricular revisions. Our work reveals how collaborators can wayfind through interdisciplinary partnerships and writing curriculum development by transforming differences in discipline-specific expertise into a new path forward.

Journal
College Composition and Communication
Published
2020-12-01
DOI
10.58680/ccc202031040
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Research in the Teaching of English

References (54) · 11 in this index

  1. “How Effective Is Critical Reading in the Understanding of Scientific Texts?”
    Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences  
  2. College English
  3. Written Communication
  4. Across the Disciplines
  5. “The Writing Intensive Program at the University of Georgia.”
    Composition Forum
Show all 54 →
  1. “Performing the Groundwork: Building a WEC/WAC Writing Program at The College of St. Scho…
    Composition Forum
  2. Genre: An Introduction to History, Theory, Research, and Pedagogy
  3. 10.2307/375913
  4. “Generating Dialogue in Assessment Feedback: Exploring the Use of Interactive Cover Sheets.”
    Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education  
  5. “Languaging in Collaborative Writing: Creation of and Response to Expertise.”
    Multiple Perspectives on Interaction: Second Language Research in Honor of
  6. 10.1152/advan.00138.2012
  7. “Ways of Knowing, Doing, and Writing in the Disciplines.”
    Writing Across the Curriculum: A Critical Sourcebook
  8. “Implementing Writing Intensive Gen Ed Seminars at a Small, Catholic University.”
    Composition Forum
  9. “The ICAP Framework: Linking Cognitive Engagement to Active Learning Outcomes.”
    Educational Psychologist  
  10. “Student Revision with Peer and Expert Reviewing.”
    Learning and Instruction  
  11. “Scaffolded Writing and Rewriting in the Discipline: A Web-Based Reciprocal Peer Review S…
    Computers & Education,  
  12. “Peer Reviewers Learn from Giving Comments.”
    Instructional Science  
  13. “Using Rubrics as a Scientific Writing Instructional Method in Early Stage Undergraduate …
    Journal of Undergraduate Neuroscience Education: JUNE
  14. “Teaching the Process of Science: Faculty Perceptions and an Effective Methodology.”
    CBE - Life Sciences Education  
  15. “A Writing-Intensive, Methods-Based Laboratory Course for Undergraduates.”
    Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education  
  16. “‘Multiliteracies’: New Literacies, New Learning.”
    Pedagogies: An International Journal  
  17. “Perceived Roadblocks to Transferring Knowledge from First-Year Composition to Writing-In…
    WPA: Writing Program Administration
  18. Across the Disciplines
  19. “Academic Writing and Tacit Knowledge.”
    Teaching in Higher Education  
  20. “Integrating Communication into Engineering Curricula: An Interdisciplinary Approach to F…
    Composition Forum
  21. “Critical Reading in (Interpretation) Research.”
    Getting Started in Interpreting Research: Methodological Reflections, Personal Accounts and Advice for Beginners
  22. “Betwixt and Between: The Social Position and Stress Experiences of Graduate Students.”
    Teaching Sociology  
  23. “The Five Minute Teach: Instructional Design to Support TA Training and Writing Instructi…
    Journal of College Science Teaching  
  24. “MetaFeedback: A Model for Teaching Instructor Response to Student Writing in the Sciences.”
    Scientific Communication: Practices, Theories, and Pedagogies,
  25. The Bedford Guide to Teaching Writing in the Disciplines: An Instructor’s Desk Reference.
  26. College Composition and Communication
  27. “Coping with Loneliness: A Netnographic Study of Doctoral Students.”
    Journal of Further and Higher Education  
  28. “Students’ Perceptions about Peer Assessment for Writing: Their Origin and Impact on Revi…
    Instructional Science,  
  29. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  30. Across the Disciplines
  31. “The Nature of Scientific Discussion: Critical Reading and the Introductory Science Course.”
    Journal of Reading
  32. “Guaranteeing the Failure of First-Year Composition: Four Assumptions about Writing Exper…
    International Journal of Learning
  33. “Speaking of Knowing: Conceptions of Understanding in Academic Disciplines.”
    Writing, Teaching, and Learning in the Disciplines
  34. 10.4159/9780674417502
    Making the Most of College: Students Speak Their Minds  
  35. “Learning from Interdisciplinary Interactions: An Argument for Rhetorical Deliberation as…
    Composition Forum
  36. College Composition and Communication
  37. “The Nature of Feedback: How Different Types of Peer Feedback Affect Writing Performance.”
    Instructional Science  
  38. “A Pedagogy of Multiliteracies: Designing Social Futures.”
    Harvard Educational Review  
  39. Agents of Integration: Understanding Transfer as a Rhetorical Act
  40. “Technology-Enhanced Peer Review: Benefits and Implications of Providing Multiple Reviews.”
    Journal of Educational Technology & Society
  41. Across the Disciplines
  42. “Reformist Possibilities? Exploring Writing Program Cross-Campus Partnerships.”
    WPA Writing Program Administration
  43. Across the Disciplines
  44. Writing in the Academic Disciplines: A Curricular History
  45. Across the Disciplines
  46. The End of Composition Studies
  47. Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings
  48. 10.1017/CBO9781139524827
    Research Genres: Explorations and Applications  
  49. “Development of a ‘Universal’ Rubric for Assessing Undergraduates’ Scientific Reasoning S…
    Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education