Abstract

Interdisciplinary collaborations to help students compose for discipline-specific contexts draw on multiple expertise. Science, technology, education, and mathematics (STEM) programs particularly rely on their writing colleagues because 1) their academic expertise is often not writing and 2) teaching writing often necessitates a redesigning of existing instructional materials. While many writing studies scholars have the expertise to assist their STEM colleagues with such tasks, how to do so—and, more fundamentally, how to begin such efforts—is not commonly focused on in the literature stemming from these collaborations. Our article addresses this gap by detailing an interdisciplinary Writing in the Disciplines (WID) collaboration at a large, public R1 university between STEM and writing experts to redesign the university’s introductory biology writing curriculum. The collaborative curriculum design process detailed here is presented through the lens of wayfinding, which concerns orientation, trailblazing, and moving through uncertain landscapes according to cues. Within this account, a critical focus on language—what we talk about when we talk about writing—emerges, driving both the collaboration itself and resultant curricular revisions. Our work reveals how collaborators can wayfind through interdisciplinary partnerships and writing curriculum development by transforming differences in discipline-specific expertise into a new path forward.

Journal
College Composition and Communication
Published
2020-12-01
DOI
10.58680/ccc202031040
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Research in the Teaching of English

Cites in this index (4)

  1. College English
  2. Written Communication
  3. College Composition and Communication
  4. College Composition and Communication
Also cites 28 works outside this index ↓
  1. “How Effective Is Critical Reading in the Understanding of Scientific Texts?”
    Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences  
  2. “How to Create High-Impact Writing Assignments That Enhance Learning and Development and …
    Across the Disciplines  
  3. 10.2307/375913
  4. “Generating Dialogue in Assessment Feedback: Exploring the Use of Interactive Cover Sheets.”
    Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education  
  5. 10.1152/advan.00138.2012
  6. “The ICAP Framework: Linking Cognitive Engagement to Active Learning Outcomes.”
    Educational Psychologist  
  7. “Student Revision with Peer and Expert Reviewing.”
    Learning and Instruction  
  8. “Scaffolded Writing and Rewriting in the Discipline: A Web-Based Reciprocal Peer Review S…
    Computers & Education,  
  9. “Peer Reviewers Learn from Giving Comments.”
    Instructional Science  
  10. “Teaching the Process of Science: Faculty Perceptions and an Effective Methodology.”
    CBE - Life Sciences Education  
  11. “A Writing-Intensive, Methods-Based Laboratory Course for Undergraduates.”
    Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education  
  12. “‘Multiliteracies’: New Literacies, New Learning.”
    Pedagogies: An International Journal  
  13. “Connected, Disconnected, or Uncertain: Student Attitudes about Future Writing Contexts a…
    Across the Disciplines  
  14. “Academic Writing and Tacit Knowledge.”
    Teaching in Higher Education  
  15. “Betwixt and Between: The Social Position and Stress Experiences of Graduate Students.”
    Teaching Sociology  
  16. “The Five Minute Teach: Instructional Design to Support TA Training and Writing Instructi…
    Journal of College Science Teaching  
  17. “Coping with Loneliness: A Netnographic Study of Doctoral Students.”
    Journal of Further and Higher Education  
  18. “Students’ Perceptions about Peer Assessment for Writing: Their Origin and Impact on Revi…
    Instructional Science,  
  19. 10.1109/TPC.2019.2961009
  20. “WID Course Enhancements in STEM: The Impact of Adding ‘Writing Circles’ and Writing Proc…
    Across the Disciplines  
  21. 10.4159/9780674417502
    Making the Most of College: Students Speak Their Minds  
  22. “The Nature of Feedback: How Different Types of Peer Feedback Affect Writing Performance.”
    Instructional Science  
  23. “A Pedagogy of Multiliteracies: Designing Social Futures.”
    Harvard Educational Review  
  24. “Interdisciplinarity as a Lens for Theorizing Language/Content Partnerships.”
    Across the Disciplines  
  25. “The (In)Visible World of Teaching Assistants in the Disciplines: Preparing TAs to Teach …
    Across the Disciplines  
  26. “One More Time: Transforming the Curriculum across the Disciplines through Technology-Bas…
    Across the Disciplines  
  27. 10.1017/CBO9781139524827
    Research Genres: Explorations and Applications  
  28. “Development of a ‘Universal’ Rubric for Assessing Undergraduates’ Scientific Reasoning S…
    Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education  
CrossRef global citation count: 4 View in citation network →