The Communication Coefficient Method: A New Faculty Grading Tool Designed to Help Engineering Students Improve Their Technical Communication

Edward Londner MIT Lincoln Laboratory ; Matthew Dabkowski United States Military Academy ; Ian Kloo United States Military Academy ; J. D. Caddell

Abstract

<bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Introduction:</b> Engineering students benefit from understanding the role of technical communication in the professional workplace. This article examines the communication coefficient (CC), a new method for grading student technical communication intended to help students better understand this role. Its goal is to encourage students to treat their communication with the same importance that it has in the professional workplace. <bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">About the case:</b> The core philosophy of the CC method is that audiences perceive technical work more positively when it is communicated well and more negatively when it is not. The method captures this philosophy mathematically: students’ grades result from multiplying the points earned for technical content by a number—the coefficient—representing how well they communicated that content. <bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Situating the case:</b> The CC method is rooted in established principles, such as holistic grading and the separate yet simultaneous consideration of content and communication. It is novel in how it combines these principles into a grading technique. <bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Approach:</b> The CC method was employed in three undergraduate engineering classes at the United States Military Academy during the spring 2020 semester. Student and instructor feedback were collected to gauge the pros and cons of the method and whether it is worth fielding on a larger scale. <bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Discussion:</b> The CC method was found to encourage better student communication, although mixed student and instructor opinion suggest that changes to the method and the way that it is messaged are necessary. <bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Conclusion:</b> The CC method warrants further study and consideration of its usefulness in other departments and institutions.

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Published
2023-06-01
DOI
10.1109/tpc.2023.3260479
CompPile
Open Access
OA PDF Bronze
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (80) · 8 in this index

  1. 10.18260/1-2--34651
  2. 10.18260/1-2--32343
  3. 10.18260/p.25944
  4. 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00828.x
  5. 10.1093/swr/svy026
Show all 80 →
  1. 10.37514/PER-B.2009.2324.2.08
  2. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114523
  3. 10.1109/IPCC.2002.1049098
  4. 10.18260/1-2--6639
  5. Integrating writing into technical courses: Steps toward incorporating communication into…
    Proc Amer Soc Eng Educ Conf
  6. 10.18260/1-2--12559
  7. Technical Communication Quarterly
  8. 10.18260/1-2?9890
  9. 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2002.tb00711.x
  10. 10.4324/9780203811269
  11. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  12. 10.1080/03634520302457
  13. Technical Communication Quarterly
  14. 10.3138/9781442676695-009
  15. 10.1080/02602930801956059
  16. Effective composition instruction: What does the research show
    Center Commun Sci Technol Manage Pub Ser
  17. Assessing Writing
  18. 10.18260/1-2--31067
  19. 10.1515/9783110255492.331
  20. 10.1109/IPCC.2005.1494188
  21. 10.1080/02702710500400495
  22. 10.1111/j.1745-3984.1969.tb00665.x
  23. 10.3102/00028312003002125
  24. 10.18260/1-2--33079
  25. 10.1109/IPCC.2005.1494208
  26. The right answer is communication when capstone engineering courses drive the questions
    J Sci Technol Eng Math Educ
  27. 10.1109/FIE.2001.963905
  28. 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2012.tb00043.x
  29. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  30. 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2008.tb00995.x
  31. 10.1080/00221300209602029
  32. 10.1187/cbe.cbe-14-03-0054
  33. How to Give Effective Feedback to Your Student
  34. 10.1007/s11192-017-2609-2
  35. 10.1177/1049732319889354
  36. 10.1177/1077699017736040
  37. 10.1515/lingvan-2015-0011
  38. 10.1080/15332861.2012.650988
  39. 10.1080/87567555.2011.633287
  40. 10.18260/1-2--29159
  41. How Learning Works Seven Research-Based Principles for Smart Teaching
  42. 10.18260/1-2--28932
  43. 10.1115/1.4042081
  44. 10.1177/073953291103200205
  45. 10.12735/ier.v2i3p18
  46. 10.18260/1-2?8621
  47. 10.18260/1-2--22315
  48. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  49. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  50. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  51. 10.4135/9781452218649.n8
  52. Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions
  53. 10.1080/0969594X.2019.1593105
  54. 10.3200/JRLP.139.5.401-412
  55. 10.1080/00029238.1971.11080840
  56. Loss aversion and student achievement
    Economics Bulletin
  57. 10.1037/h0026256
  58. Positive and negative incentives in the classroom: An analysis of grading systems and stu…
    Journal of Scholarship of Teaching and Learning
  59. 10.13140/2.1.1828.6084
  60. vcd: Visualizing categorical data
  61. 10.1002/jee.20161
  62. Likert: Analysis and visualization likert items
  63. 10.1201/b17434
  64. 10.18260/1-2--32061
  65. 10.1177/1098214005283748
  66. 10.2307/1914185
  67. 10.4300/JGME-5-4-18
  68. Influencing positive student behavior using the endowment effect
    E-Journal of Business Education & Scholarship of Teaching
  69. Teaching technical communications to get students: A case study approach paper
    Proc Amer Soc Eng Educ Annu Conf
  70. 10.1109/FIE.2001.963905
  71. Improve technical communication using scaffolding method in mechanical engineering courses
    Proc Fall Amer Soc Eng Educ Middle Atlantic Sect Meeting
  72. 10.1007/s10459-010-9222-y
  73. 10.1214/aos/1176344552
  74. 10.1016/j.cptl.2015.08.001