Abstract

The four‐phase project described here is based both on current social theories of writing and on contemporary studies of writing on the job and in the classroom. Phase one suggests methods for team organization, phase two the proposal submission, phase three the individual discussion chapter component, and phase four group components and team editing. Both teacher and student provide input for report evaluation. The author's survey of 29 formal report groups found positive attitudes toward both the formal report and collaborative writing.

Journal
Technical Communication Quarterly
Published
1993-03-01
DOI
10.1080/10572259309364530
Open Access
Closed

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (2)

  1. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  2. Journal of Business and Technical Communication

Cites in this index (10)

  1. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  2. Rhetoric Review
  3. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  4. Written Communication
  5. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Show all 10 →
  1. Rhetoric Review
  2. Written Communication
  3. Written Communication
  4. College English
  5. Research in the Teaching of English
Also cites 8 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.2307/357492
  2. 10.1177/105065198700100206
  3. 10.2307/377264
  4. 10.2307/377272
  5. 10.2307/356600
  6. 10.1177/002194368602300404
  7. 10.1037/0033-2909.91.3.517
  8. 10.1177/108056998705000305
    Bulletin of the Association for Business Communication  
CrossRef global citation count: 3 View in citation network →