The Passive Voice and Social Values in Science

Daniel D. Ding Ferris State University

Abstract

This article claims that two social values in science—falsifiability of science and cooperation among scientists—determine use of passives in scientific communication. Scientists do not always develop valid theories, so scientific experiments must be amenable to being repeated and found invalid. This requires that the experiments must not be discrete events. Science is also a cooperative enterprise. As an integral part of science, scientific writing employs more passives than actives to focus on materials, methods, figures, processes, tables, concepts, etc. Use of passives to focus on the physical world helps de-emphasize discreteness of scientific experiments. Besides, it also helps remove personal qualifications of observing experimental results. Finally, it enhances cooperation among working scientists by providing a common knowledge base of scientific work—things and objects. Looked at in this way, the passive voice in scientific writing represents professional practices of science instead of personal stylistic choices of individual scientists.

Journal
Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Published
2002-04-01
DOI
10.2190/efmr-bjf3-ce41-84kk
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (8)

  1. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  2. Written Communication
  3. Written Communication
  4. Technical Communication Quarterly
  5. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Show all 8 →
  1. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  2. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  3. Written Communication

Cites in this index (5)

  1. Written Communication
  2. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  3. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  4. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  5. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Also cites 20 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.2307/377700
  2. 10.1177/053901847301200602
  3. 10.4324/9780203317211
  4. 10.7208/chicago/9780226458106.001.0001
  5. 10.1007/BF01558020
  6. 10.1177/053901847701600105
  7. 10.1177/053901847701600602
  8. 10.1016/0889-4906(91)90015-O
  9. 10.4324/9780203332450
  10. 10.1177/105065198700100105
  11. 10.1007/BF00167894
  12. 10.1017/S0047404500019205
  13. 10.1038/227680a0
  14. 10.1086/353797
  15. 10.1080/00335637509383302
  16. 10.1007/978-94-009-9109-5_10
  17. 10.1073/pnas.74.2.560
  18. 10.1074/jbc.274.53.37679
  19. 10.1038/43705
  20. 10.1021/ja981987w
CrossRef global citation count: 30 View in citation network →