Examining Structure in Scientific Research Articles: A Study of Thematic Progression and Thematic Density

Alvin Ping Leong Nanyang Technological University ; Audrey Lin Lin Toh Nanyang Technological University ; Soo Fun Chin Nanyang Technological University

Abstract

While scholars in the field of writing studies have examined scientific writing from multiple perspectives, interest in its thematic structure has been modest. Recent studies suggest that the themes in scientific writing tend to be anchored on one or a few points of departure. There has also been an attempt at quantification using the thematic-density index (TDI), although this has only been tested on abstracts. In this study, we investigated the thematic structure and TDIs of 30 research articles in biology. The results revealed a progressive thematic pattern in the introduction section, followed by an anchored development in the subsequent sections. The anchoring was realized by the pervasive use of the first-person pronoun “we.” The mean TDI was lowest in the introduction section (2.593) and highest in the results section (7.095). The results were consistent across the articles in the corpus, underscoring the uniform way in which the articles were thematically structured, and in turn suggesting a core thematic pattern for scientific research writing in general. Based on these findings, the authors suggest that future studies compare the thematic structure of the introduction section vis-à-vis the other sections, and investigate the possible factors resulting in such a structure.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
2018-07-01
DOI
10.1177/0741088318767378
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. College English

Cites in this index (2)

  1. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  2. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Also cites 25 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1017/S0047404500019205
  2. 10.1186/s40554-017-0045-5
  3. 10.1515/9783110872521.132
  4. 10.1515/9783111676524.106
  5. 10.1515/text.1.1987.7.2.89
  6. 10.1093/oso/9780195134544.001.0001
  7. 10.4324/9780203783771
  8. 10.1016/j.amper.2015.06.002
  9. 10.1016/S0889-4906(00)00012-0
  10. 10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00035-8
  11. 10.1016/S0889-4906(97)00058-6
  12. 10.1371/journal.pone.0127502
  13. 10.22323/2.13010203
    Journal of Science Communication  
  14. 10.1515/text-2015-0001
  15. 10.1080/00437956.2016.1248668
  16. 10.1075/z.59
  17. 10.1016/j.jslw.2005.06.001
  18. 10.1093/applin/ams059
  19. 10.1177/030631285015004002
  20. 10.1016/S0889-4906(97)85388-4
  21. 10.1515/9783110883527.369
  22. 10.1515/opli-2017-0001
  23. 10.1016/S0889-4906(97)00032-X
  24. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.04.007
  25. 10.1075/lic.9.2.03wil
CrossRef global citation count: 13 View in citation network →