Passive Voice and Rhetorical Role in Scientific Writing

Kathryn Riley University of Minnesota, Duluth

Abstract

As analysts of scientific writing begin to modify their stance against the passive voice and explore the complexities of its use, more research is needed on the rhetorical functions it serves in scientific writing. An analysis of twelve articles reporting experimental studies in speech-language pathology revealed consistently higher percentages of passive structures in the Method and Results sections, with relatively lower percentages in the Introduction and Discussion sections. These findings suggest that passive structures are more appropriate for expository purposes, in those sections where the author's rhetorical role is to describe procedures and present data. In contrast, active structures are more appropriate for argumentative purposes, in those sections where the author is criticizing previous research or advocating a new thesis.

Journal
Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Published
1991-07-01
DOI
10.2190/y51y-p6qf-3lcc-4auh
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (5)

  1. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  2. Technical Communication Quarterly
  3. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  4. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  5. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication

Cites in this index (5)

  1. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  2. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  3. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  4. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  5. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Also cites 3 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1515/9783110908930
  2. 10.2307/357679
  3. 10.1080/03075078712331378052
CrossRef global citation count: 23 View in citation network →