Exploring the Interpersonal Functions of Negation in Science Writing Across 35 Years

Huiyu Wang Harbin Institute of Petroleum ; Ying Wei Nanjing University ; Mingxin Yao Nanjing University

Abstract

Researchers’ investment in reader engagement includes the construction of an appealing abstract. While numerous studies have been conducted on abstracts’ rhetorical features, scant empirical attention has been paid to negation use in academic writing. The current study seeks to narrow the research gap from a general and diachronic perspective by adopting an interpersonal model of negation. We found that while not, no, and little tend to be the commonly used negative markers in Science abstracts, little increased diachronically but decreased for not and no. Functionally, writers prefer to use interactive negations and employ relatively more negative markers that function as consequence (interactive dimension) and hedging (interactional dimension) in their abstracts. Finally, we discuss the possible reasons for such results as well as their pedagogical implications.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
10.1177/07410883241263525
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (1)

  1. Written Communication
Also cites 29 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1515/ling.1979.17.1-2.79
  2. 10.1016/j.pragma.2011.03.015
  3. 10.1016/j.jeap.2010.02.004
  4. 10.1515/text.1.1998.18.3.349
  5. 10.3998/mpub.6719
  6. 10.1177/1461445605050365
  7. 10.4324/9780429433962
  8. 10.1016/j.pragma.2021.06.018
  9. 10.1093/applin/25.2.156
  10. 10.1016/j.esp.2004.02.002
  11. 10.1016/j.esp.2022.06.003
  12. 10.1016/j.jeap.2020.100851
  13. 10.1057/9780230511910
  14. 10.1515/9783110197631
  15. 10.1111/j.1749-818X.2007.00026.x
  16. 10.1075/hoph.5.12mie
  17. 10.11613/BM.2017.030201
  18. 10.1093/applin/10.1.1
  19. 10.1371/journal.pone.0231305
  20. 10.1353/lan.2011.0035
  21. 10.1017/S002222670000815X
  22. 10.1126/science.1182597
  23. 10.1016/j.jeap.2019.01.003
  24. 10.1093/applin/22.1.58
  25. 10.1111/j.1467-9582.1987.tb00779.x
  26. 10.1136/bmj.h6467
  27. 10.1002/asi.4630210507
  28. 10.1093/applin/amab037
  29. 10.1177/002383098502800301
CrossRef global citation count: 1 View in citation network →