Abstract

The impersonalizing role passive voice plays in scientific discourse is well known. Analysis of the Methods sections of nine medical research articles shows that metonymy is another frequent strategy used to create anonymous authors/agents. Discourse agents were categorized into four semantic domains: familial lay, nonfamilial lay, authorial professional, and nonauthorial professional. Agents were investigated in relation to impersonalization and social identity. Results show that although possessive/causative metonyms produce generic participants and reduce most rival researchers to “previous studies,” significant health professionals are often referred to in terms of representational/locative metonyms, highlighting their authoritative social identities. Additionally, authors are either highly visible or, if they choose to disguise themselves, they do so quite drastically using impersonalization devices or agentless passives. In contrast, for other researchers and health professionals, co-occurrence of metonymy and passive voice is generally avoided; nevertheless, these agents are usually more hidden than are the present authors.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
2007-07-01
DOI
10.1177/0741088307302946
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication

References (51) · 3 in this index

  1. The grammar of case: Towards a localist theory
  2. 10.1017/S026719059919010X
  3. Newsletter
  4. Barber, C. (1962). Some measurable characteristics of modern scientific prose. In F. Behre (Ed.), Contributio…
  5. 10.1016/S0378-2166(04)00189-4
Show all 51 →
  1. Blanco-Gómez, M.L. (2002). Hiding the agent in English and Spanish newspaper articles: The periphrastic passi…
  2. Chilton, P.A. (2000). Participant roles and the analysis of leadership discourse: British and American leader…
  3. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
  4. 10.1515/9783110219197.161
  5. Ding, D. (1998). Rationality reborn: Historical roots of the passive voice in scientific discourse. In J. Bat…
  6. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  7. Review of Applied Linguistics
  8. 10.1136/bmj.315.7117.1181
  9. 10.1136/bmj.320.7244.1229
  10. 10.1016/S0889-4906(96)00034-8
  11. Quaderni di Semantica
  12. 10.1136/bmj.327.7422.1019
  13. 10.1177/030631277600600302
  14. On understanding grammar
  15. Givón, T. (1994). The pragmatics of de-transitive voice: Functional and typological aspects of inversion. In …
  16. An introduction to functional grammar
  17. 10.1136/bmj.312.7042.1326
  18. 10.1075/ijcl.4.2.02hun
  19. 10.1016/0889-4906(94)90004-3
  20. 10.1093/applin/17.4.433
  21. Language and cognition
  22. 10.1136/bmj.317.7172.1558
  23. 10.1016/0378-2166(90)90004-W
  24. 10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001
  25. Foundations of cognitive grammar
  26. 10.1177/0957926502013004453
  27. Marín Arrese, J.I. (2002). Mystification of agency in passive, impersonal and spontaneous situation types. In…
  28. Myers G. (1990). Stories and styles in two molecular biology review articles. In C. Bazerman & J. Paradis (Ed…
  29. Proceedings of the Corpus Linguistics 2001 conference
  30. Journal of Advanced Composition
  31. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  32. 10.1136/bmj.318.7196.1443
  33. Medicine
  34. 10.1136/bmj.323.7306.194
  35. 10.1016/0277-9536(93)90287-E
  36. Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings
  37. Talmy, L. (1985). Lexicalisation patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In T. Shopen (Ed.), Language …
  38. 10.1136/bmj.325.7371.1007
  39. 10.1016/0272-2380(81)90004-4
  40. 10.1016/S0889-4906(97)00032-X
  41. Written Communication
  42. 10.1016/j.pragma.2004.08.004
  43. Newsletter
  44. 10.1136/bmj.38258.507928.55
  45. UEA Papers in Linguistics
  46. Personal pronouns in present-day English: Studies in English language series