The Impact of NSF and NIH Websites on Researcher Ethics

Ryan Hoover Texas Tech University

Abstract

The fragmentation of science and medicine research in recent years has led to the creation of subdisciplines with distinct identities and ethics. Like many social communities, these subdisciplines have found websites of federal funding agencies such as the National Science Foundation (NSF) and National Institutes of Health (NIH) to be an effective and efficient home in which to solidify that identity and communicate those values. Despite the lack of collaborative, Web 2.0 technologies, the sites of NSF and NIH are able to communicate the ethics of the science communities they serve through rhetorical structures as diverse as graphics, page layout, and site structures. This article explores that role of NSF and NIH, including the rhetoric used, the ethics presented, and their broader implications.

Journal
Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Published
2010-10-01
DOI
10.2190/tw.40.4.c
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Computers and Composition

References (55) · 11 in this index

  1. 10.1002/9780470773666
  2. Super crunchers: Why thinking-by-numbers is the new way to be smart
  3. Heart & Lung: The Journal of Critical Care
  4. Readings and feelings: An introduction to subjective criticism
  5. Buckius R. O. (2007). United States/Ireland R&D partnership. Retrieved December 9, 2008, from http://www.nsf.…
Show all 55 →
  1. Technical Communication
  2. 10.4324/9780203449769
  3. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  4. Dybas C. & Makulowich J. (2005). Press Release 05–176:NSF, NIH Award Ecology of Infectious Diseases Grants.Re…
  5. 10.1136/bmj.328.7449.1166
  6. Community in the digital age
  7. Is there a text in this class? The authority of interpretive communities
  8. 10.1215/9780822381600
  9. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  10. Rhetoric Review
  11. 5 Readers reading
  12. Reader-response criticism: From formalism to poststructuralism
  13. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  14. 10.56021/9780801821011
  15. Reader-response criticism: From formalism to poststructuralism
  16. Kafafi Z. H. (2008). Discussion of broader impacts. Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2008/nsf08062/nsf0…
  17. Killoran J. B. (2002, May 27). Controversy and “the information provider of choice”: The reconceptualization …
  18. The economics of attention: Style and substance in the age of information
  19. 10.1177/0891243206293030
  20. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  21. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  22. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  23. National Cancer Institute (NCI). (2008a). About NCI Hope Page—National Cancer Institute. Retrieved March 26, …
  24. National Cancer Institute (NCI). (2008b). NCI Mission Statement—National Cancer Institute. Retrieved March 26…
  25. National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH). (2008a). NIMH—About NIMH. Retrieved March 26, 2008, from http://w…
  26. National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH). (2008b). NIMH—Division of Neuroscience and Basic Behavioral Scien…
  27. National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH). (2008c). NIMH—Offices and Divisions. Retrieved March 26, 2008, fr…
  28. National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH). (2008d). NIMH—Schizophrenia—How is schizophrenia treated? Retriev…
  29. National Institutes of Health (NIH). (2007). National Institutes of Health (NIH). Retrieved November 15, 2007…
  30. National Institutes of Health (NIH). (2008a). National Institutes of Health 2007–2008 Peer Review Self-Study.…
  31. National Institutes of Health (NIH). (2008b). NIH—About NIH. Retrieved December 11, 2008, from http://www.nih…
  32. National Institutes of Health (NIH). (2008c). NIH—Trans-NIH Scientific Initiatives. Retrieved March 26, 2008,…
  33. National Science Foundation (NSF). (2007). US NSF—National Science Foundation. Retrieved November 30, 2007, f…
  34. National Science Foundation (NSF). (2008a). The National Science Foundation Proposal and Award Policies and P…
  35. National Science Foundation (NSF). (2008b). nsf.gov—Directorate for Biological Sciences (BIO)–US National Sci…
  36. National Science Foundation (NSF). (2008c). nsf.gov—Directorate for Geosciences (GEO)–US National Science Fou…
  37. National Science Foundation (NSF). (2008d). nsf.gov—Directorate for Mathematical & Physical Sciences (MPS)–US…
  38. National Science Foundation (NSF). (2008e). US NSF—About the National Science Foundation. Retrieved July 2, 2…
  39. BMC Psychiatry
  40. 10.1017/CBO9780511606373
  41. Rhetoric Review
  42. 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2005.tb00268.x
  43. Rhetoric Review
  44. 10.1086/209411
  45. 10.1016/S0933-3657(97)00045-6
  46. Technical Communication Quarterly
  47. 10.1086/521158
    ISIS: Journal of the History of Science in Society  
  48. 10.1159/000080198
  49. Technical Communication Quarterly
  50. Using NVivo to answer the challenges of qualitative research in professional communicatio…