Abstract

Researchers studying science communication have criticized the sensationalism that often appears in journalistic accounts of science news. This article looks at the linguistic sources of that sensationalism by analyzing the journalistic coverage of the Women’s Health Initiative (WHI) study of hormone replacement research, which was abruptly canceled in July 2002 and became the subject of many news articles. The article uses a coding system to analyze seven magazine and newspaper articles that appeared shortly after the WHI study was halted. The coding shows a high incidence of concrete nouns in the journalistic accounts and looks at the ways the syntax of their attributions are ordered to emphasize vivid nouns, the ways their verbs contribute to narrative, and some of the narrative devices employed in the journalistic reporting.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
2005-07-01
DOI
10.1177/0741088305278027
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (4)

  1. Written Communication
  2. Written Communication
  3. Technical Communication Quarterly
  4. Journal of Business and Technical Communication

Cites in this index (6)

  1. Written Communication
  2. Written Communication
  3. Written Communication
  4. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  5. Written Communication
Show all 6 →
  1. Written Communication
Also cites 2 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1177/146488490100200310
  2. 10.1001/jama.288.3.321
CrossRef global citation count: 19 View in citation network →