Written Communication Jul 2005

The Language of Journalism in Treatments of Hormone Replacement News

Susan Peck MacDonald

Abstract

Researchers studying science communication have criticized the sensationalism that often appears in journalistic accounts of science news. This article looks at the linguistic sources of that sensationalism by analyzing the journalistic coverage of the Women’s Health Initiative (WHI) study of hormone replacement research, which was abruptly canceled in July 2002 and became the subject of many news articles. The article uses a coding system to analyze seven magazine and newspaper articles that appeared shortly after the WHI study was halted. The coding shows a high incidence of concrete nouns in the journalistic accounts and looks at the ways the syntax of their attributions are ordered to emphasize vivid nouns, the ways their verbs contribute to narrative, and some of the narrative devices employed in the journalistic reporting.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
2005-07-01
DOI
10.1177/0741088305278027
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
scientific writing grammar and mechanics
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (4)

  1. Cramer et al. (2014)
    Examining Readers’ Evaluations of Objectivity and Bias in News Discourse
    Written Communication
  2. Oddo (2013)
    Discourse-Based Methods Across Texts and Semiotic Modes: Three Tools for Micro-…
    Written Communication
  3. Leake (2012)
    Science as Sound Bites: The Lancet Iraq Casualty Reports and Prefigured Accommodation
    Technical Communication Quarterly
  4. Koerber et al. (2008)
    Distortion and the Politics of Pain Relief: A Habermasian Analysis of Medicine …
    Journal of Business and Technical Communication

References (26) · 6 in this index

  1. Charney (2003)
    Lone Geniuses in Popular Science: The Devaluation of Scientific Consensus
    Written Communication
  2. Cowley, G. (2002)
    Newsweek
  3. FAHNESTOCK (1986)
    Accommodating Science: The Rhetorical Life of Scientific Facts
    Written Communication
  4. Friedman, S. M (1999)
    Communication uncertainty: Media coverage of new and controversial science
  5. Gorman, C. (2002)
    Time
Show all 26 →
  1. Gregory, J. (1998)
    Science in public: Communication, culture, and credibility
  2. Halliday, M.A.K. (1993)
    Writing science: Literacy and discursive power
  3. Hanrahan, J. (2002)
    The San Diego Union-Tribune
  4. Hartz, J. (1997)
    Worlds apart: How the distance between science and journalism threatens America’s future
  5. (1997)
    Harvard Health Letter
  6. Kazanjian, D. (2002)
    Vogue
  7. KENNAMER (1988)
    News Values and the Vividness of Information
    Written Communication
  8. Kolata, G. (2002)
    New York Times
  9. Kolata, G. (2002)
    New York Times
  10. Lerner, S. (2002)
    Village Voice
  11. MacDONALD (1992)
    A Method for Analyzing Sentence-Level Differences in Disciplinary Knowledge Making
    Written Communication
  12. MacDonald, S. P. (1994)
    Professional academic writing in the humanities and social sciences
  13. Nelkin, D. (1995)
    Selling science: How the press covers science and technology
  14. Nisbett, R. E. (1980)
    Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment
  15. Posner, T. (2002)
    Death by hormones
  16. 10.1177/146488490100200310
     ↗
  17. Rowan (1989)
    Moving beyond the What to the Why: Differences in Professional and Popular Scie…
    Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  18. Ruscio, J. (2000)
    Skeptical Inquirer
  19. KOPPLE (1994)
    Some Characteristics and Functions of Grammatical Subjects in Scientific Discourse
    Written Communication
  20. Wertheim, M. (2003)
    Los Angeles Times
  21. 10.1001/jama.288.3.321
     ↗
CrossRef global citation count: 19 View in citation network → Build reading path →

Related Articles

  1. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication Jan 1979
    Examination of the Medical/Scientific Manuscript ↗
    Lottie Applewhite
    rhetorical criticism scientific writing grammar and mechanics
  2. Assessing Writing Apr 2026
    From spelling to content: The influence of spelling quality on text assessment ↗
    Frederike Strahl; Jörg Kilian; Jens Möller
    assessment grammar and mechanics
  3. Assessing Writing Apr 2026
    How do L2 writing subskills interact hierarchically? Insights from diagnostic classification models ↗
    Farshad Effatpanah; Hamdollah Ravand; Mahmoud Abdi Tabari; Yi-Hsin Chen; Olga Kunina-Habenicht
    assessment multilingual writers grammar and mechanics
  4. Assessing Writing Apr 2026
    Pursuing fair writing assessment: Halo effects in primary school foreign language writing in grade six ↗
    Ruth Trüb; Julian Lohmann; Jens Möller; Stefan D. Keller
    assessment multilingual writers grammar and mechanics
  5. Res Rhetorica Jan 2026
    Review/Recenzja: Nancy Organ. 2024. Data Visualization for People of All Ages. Oxon: CRC Press; and Jen Christiansen. 2023. Building Science Graphics: An Illustrated Guide to Communicating Science Through Diagrams and Visualizations. Oxon: CRC Press ↗
    Ewa Modrzejewska
    modern rhetorical theory rhetorical criticism discourse analysis digital rhetoric multimodality grammar and mechanics race and writing book reviews