Distortion and the Politics of Pain Relief: A Habermasian Analysis of Medicine in the Media

Amy Koerber Texas Tech University ; E. Jonathan Arnett Texas Tech University ; Tamra Cumbie Texas Tech University

Abstract

This article invokes Habermas's ideal speech situation to analyze the controversy surrounding a recent study of pain relief for women in labor. Using Habermas's concepts, the authors argue that distortion of scientific and medical information originated in the New England Journal of Medicine article that first reported the study's results. Thus, their analysis aims to complicate the assumption that such distortion starts only with public reporting and to expose the ways that scientific or medical research from the beginning can be reported to either facilitate or preclude public debate and understanding of complex issues.

Journal
Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Published
2008-07-01
DOI
10.1177/1050651908315985
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (2)

  1. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  2. Technical Communication Quarterly

References (55) · 12 in this index

  1. New Republic
  2. Genre knowledge in disciplinary communication
  3. Interacting with audiences: Social influences on the production of scientific writing
  4. Technical Communication Quarterly
  5. Calsamiglia, H. (Ed.). (2003). Popularization discourse [Special issue]. Discourse Studies, 5(2).
Show all 55 →
  1. 10.1056/NEJMe048350
  2. 10.7208/chicago/9780226099088.001.0001
  3. Written Communication
  4. Written Communication
  5. 10.1093/clinids/9.5.987
  6. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  7. Written Communication
  8. 10.1177/016224398901400103
  9. Rhetorical figures in science
  10. The myth of heterosexual AIDS
  11. 10.1097/00006250-200207000-00032
  12. New York Times
  13. The rhetoric of science
  14. Technical Communication Quarterly
  15. Rhetorical hermeneutics: Invention and interpretation in the age of science
  16. Communication and the evolution of society (T. McCarthy
  17. The theory of communicative action: Vol. 1. Reason and the rationalization of society (T.…
  18. The theory of communicative action: Vol. 2. Lifeworld and system: A critique of functiona…
  19. Between facts and norms (W. Rehg, Trans.)
  20. Truth and justification (B. Fultner, Trans.)
  21. Technical Communication Quarterly
  22. Rhetoric and incommensurability
  23. Heslam, J. (2005, February 17). Numbing news: Early epidural not too risky. Boston Herald, p. 8.
  24. AMA manual of style: A guide for authors and editors
  25. Ecospeak: Rhetoric and environmental politics in America
  26. British Medical Journal
  27. British Medical Journal
  28. Canadian Family Physician
  29. 10.1111/j.0730-7659.2006.00076.x
  30. Canadian Journal of Diagnosis
  31. 10.1177/030631295025003001
  32. Written Communication
  33. 10.1177/1461445603005002006
  34. 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.10.821
  35. Painkillers urged in early labor. (2005, February 17). Grand Rapids Press, p. A3.
  36. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  37. A rhetoric of science: Inventing scientific discourse
  38. Technical Communication Quarterly
  39. Women's health: Complexities and differences
  40. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  41. Habermas, critical theory and health
  42. Health and the rhetoric of medicine
  43. Science Daily
  44. 10.1017/CCOL052144120X.006
  45. 10.1017/CCOL052144120X.008
  46. 10.1017/CCOL052144120X.001
  47. 10.1007/978-94-009-5239-3_1
  48. 10.1080/108107397127888
  49. 10.1056/NEJMoa042573
  50. Written Communication