One Size Does Not Fit All: How Clinical Pain Assessment Scales and Tools Mask Crip Narratives of Chronicity

Adrianna Deptula Purdue University West Lafayette

Abstract

This study investigates how chronic pain is represented in widely used pain assessment scales. Through a thematic analysis, four overarching themes are identified: pain is framed as a linear continuum, depicted as a progressive bodily obstacle, normalized to a baseline of zero, and characterized as a predictable condition. The design of these scales oversimplifies the complexities of chronic pain into a linear narrative that can potentially marginalize patient experiences and lead to treatment delays. This research advocates for a shift toward patient experience design (PXD) to develop more nuanced, human-centered assessment tools that better capture the fluidity of chronicity.

Journal
Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
10.1177/00472816251325229
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (15)

  1. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  2. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  3. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  4. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  5. Rhetoric Review
Show all 15 →
  1. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  2. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  3. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  4. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  5. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  6. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  7. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  8. College English
  9. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  10. College English
Also cites 42 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1109/TPC.2024.3387179
  2. 10.1080/24740527.2021.1889925
  3. 10.1145/3131201.3131207
  4. 10.2307/j.ctvw1d7ss
  5. 10.5744/rhm.2022.5007
  6. 10.1016/j.jpain.2017.11.014
  7. 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.663890
  8. 10.1007/978-981-10-5251-4_103
  9. 10.5744/rhm.2023.6010
  10. 10.2307/1511637
  11. 10.5744/rhm.2022.5011
  12. 10.1007/BF00988593
  13. 10.4135/9781473914650.n22
  14. 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.786916
  15. 10.5744/rhm.2021.4e4
  16. 10.7208/chicago/9780226345987.001.0001
  17. 10.3389/fpain.2023.1093002
  18. 10.4324/9781351190473-25
  19. 10.4135/9781483384436
  20. 10.5744/rhm.2019.1009
  21. 10.1136/medhum-2021-012331
  22. 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.01.008
  23. 10.26818/9780814214916
  24. 10.1093/pm/pnz336
  25. 10.1145/3131201.3131203
  26. 10.7208/chicago/9780226261317.001.0001
  27. 10.3389/fpain.2022.895443
  28. 10.3389/fpain.2022.1031058
  29. 10.5744/rhm.2024.1003
  30. 10.15585/mmwr.mm7215a1
  31. Six ways of looking at crip time
    Disability Studies Quarterly  
  32. 10.1016/j.pain.2012.01.001
  33. 10.1145/353927.353931
  34. 10.7551/mitpress/6875.001.0001
  35. 10.1558/cam.19939
  36. 10.3389/fcomm.2020.00036
  37. 10.7208/chicago/9780226450834.001.0001
  38. 10.1111/spc3.12161
  39. 10.1145/2524248.2524257
  40. 10.1017/CBO9780511576706.013
  41. 10.5744/rhm.2022.5002
  42. 10.1145/3188173.3188177
CrossRef global citation count: 0 View in citation network →