Designing Equitable and Inclusive mHealth Technology: Insights from Global South Healthcare Practitioners

Keshab Raj Acharya University at Buffalo, State University of New York

Abstract

Introduction: Recently, the exponential rise of mobile health applications (mHealth apps) has drawn the attention of healthcare practitioners worldwide. This case study investigates Nepalese healthcare practitioners’ perceptions and use of mHealth tools designed in the Global North (GN). The study also explores strategies for fostering inclusivity and accessibility of these tools within Global South (GS) healthcare settings. About the case: Healthcare practitioners in Nepal widely use GN mHealth apps, such as Medscape, for diverse purposes, including aiding health-related decisions and accessing pharmaceutical and disease information. Apps like Medscape offer valuable information on diseases, conditions, and medical procedures, proving highly beneficial for treating patients in critical care situations in GS countries like Nepal. Situating the case: mHealth apps have significantly transformed healthcare delivery in resource-limited, low-income GS countries such as Nepal, enhancing accessibility and efficiency in medical services. However, research in the technical and professional communication (TPC) field regarding how GS healthcare practitioners perceive and interact with emerging digital health technologies within resource-constrained healthcare contexts is scarce. Methods: To gather data, 12 Nepalese healthcare practitioners were interviewed about their perception and use of GN mHealth apps, with a particular focus on Medscape. Results: In addition to the potential benefits of using the case app, participants indicated the need for designing culturally sensitive and context-appropriate mHealth technology. Moreover, results suggest that GN mHealth tools should be tailored to the diverse needs of underserved and underrepresented GS users to promote inclusivity and self-efficacy. Conclusion: Adopting justice-oriented localized user-experience design approaches that value diversity, equity, and social justice can help build a more inclusive form of health communication.

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Published
2024-06-01
DOI
10.1109/tpc.2024.3387179
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (20)

  1. Rhetoric of Health and Medicine
  2. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  3. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  4. Communication Design Quarterly
  5. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Show all 20 →
  1. Rhetoric of Health and Medicine
  2. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  3. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  4. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  5. Communication Design Quarterly
  6. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  7. Communication Design Quarterly
  8. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  9. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  10. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  11. Computers and Composition
  12. Communication Design Quarterly
  13. Technical Communication Quarterly
  14. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  15. Technical Communication Quarterly
Also cites 44 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-052020-103738
  2. 10.2196/mhealth.8764
  3. 10.1371/journal.pone.0201513
  4. 10.1176/appi.ps.202000098
  5. 10.2196/25667
  6. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199744763.001.0001
  7. 10.1007/978-3-030-26399-7
  8. 10.1016/j.destud.2012.11.005
  9. 10.3389/fdgth.2022.861019
  10. 10.1186/s12911-021-01386-0
  11. 10.1007/s13187-012-0446-9
  12. 10.1080/15424065.2018.1554465
  13. 10.5993/ajhb.38.6.8
  14. 10.2196/jmir.2143
  15. 10.2196/mhealth.3422
  16. 10.55177/tc584938
  17. 10.4324/9780203108543.ch3
  18. 10.1145/3380851.3416763
  19. 10.1145/2723869
  20. 10.1145/2666216.2666223
  21. 10.1093/oso/9780190845582.001.0001
  22. 10.1145/3328020.3353957
  23. 10.55177/tc885177
  24. 10.1007/bf02897302
  25. 10.1093/inthealth/ihz008
  26. 10.15171/ijhpm.2018.121
  27. 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04559.x
  28. 10.1007/978-3-540-74800-7_7
  29. 10.1177/1609406920913675
  30. 10.1177/1049732316689067
  31. 10.46743/2160-3715/2018.3266
  32. 10.1177/0894439303262561
  33. 10.2478/s13374-014-0240-y
  34. 10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y
  35. 10.4135/9781849208574
  36. 10.1089/tmj.2015.0180
  37. 10.1186/s12889-016-3808-0
  38. 10.4135/9781412952576.n182
  39. 10.1177/0145445500241002
  40. 10.7551/mitpress/11647.001.0001
  41. 10.1093/jamia/ocv075
  42. 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002748
  43. 10.1177/0306396818823172
  44. 10.3126/kmcrj.v2i2.29949