Surveying Precarious Publics

Christa Teston The Ohio State University ; Laura Gonzales The University of Texas at El Paso ; Kristin Marie Bivens Harold Washington College ; Kelly Whitney New Mexico State University

Abstract

This essay assumes that the design and use of surveys is a fundamentally rhetorical act. It provides suggestions for employing and designing health-related surveys intended for research participants who might be characterized as inhabiting one or more precarious positionalities. We use “precarious positionality” to signal when research participants self-identify as one or more of the following: a racial and/or linguistic minority, economically disadvantaged, disabled, former or current drug user, undocumented, un(der)educated, oppressed, sexualized, disenfranchised, criminalized,and/or colonized. Drawing on the research team’s experiences with piloting what we hope will eventually become a nationwide survey, the essay describes how to avoid several survey-designpitfalls; it also makes recommendations for how to improve survey-based health research that enrolls participants who inhabit one or more precarious positionalities. Our recommendations attend to rhetorical complexities related to survey ethics, inclusion criteria, privacy, stigmatized and misleading language, variations in discursive repertoires, accessibility, and liability.

Journal
Rhetoric of Health and Medicine
Published
2019-10-08
DOI
10.5744/rhm.2019.1015
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
OA PDF Gold
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (7)

  1. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  2. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  3. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  4. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  5. Technical Communication Quarterly
Show all 7 →
  1. Technical Communication Quarterly
  2. Rhetoric Society Quarterly

References (0)

No references on file for this article.