Abstract

In technical and professional communication, the social justice turn calls on us to interrogate sites of positionality, privilege, and power to help foreground strategies that can empower marginalized groups. I propose that mainstream media coverage of the opioid epidemic represents such a site because addiction to these drugs, which initially primarily affected White people, has been positioned as a public health issue rather than a criminal justice problem. I explore the strategies that were used to create this positioning by investigating themes in the visual rhetoric as conveyed through data visualizations and in the text of the articles in which these graphics were published. My results align with two previous studies that confirmed this public health framing. I also observed an emphasis on mortality, which contributes to our understanding of rhetorical strategies that can be used to engender support rather than condemnation for those suffering from drug addiction.

Journal
Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Published
2023-04-01
DOI
10.1177/00472816221125186
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (3)

  1. Technical Communication Quarterly
  2. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  3. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Also cites 30 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.17265/2159-5313/2016.09.003
  2. 10.1177/1741659013511975
  3. 10.1111/j.1533-8525.1997.tb00758.x
  4. 10.1111/j.1533-8525.1999.tb01730.x
  5. 10.4135/9781452270043
  6. 10.2307/3096971
  7. 10.1353/sor.2006.0010
  8. 10.1073/pnas.1518393112
  9. 10.5744/rhm.2019.1014
  10. 10.1177/0091450917739391
  11. 10.1177/009145099602300203
  12. 10.7330/9781607327585.c010
  13. 10.1176/appi.ps.201500065
  14. 10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.105771
  15. 10.1080/17512786.2017.1409647
  16. 10.1017/S1742058X11000208
  17. The American disease. Origins of narcotic control
  18. 10.1007/s11013-016-9496-5
  19. 10.2307/3096921
  20. 10.1177/0091450917722817
  21. 10.1215/9780822396451
  22. 10.1080/1369118X.2019.1566393
  23. 10.1215/03616878-8004862
  24. 10.1177/0091450916642515
  25. 10.5744/rhm.2019.1015
  26. 10.1515/transcript.9783839426104.81
  27. 10.4324/9780429198748
  28. 10.1080/02791072.2009.10400533
  29. 10.1109/TPC.2022.3144826
  30. 10.1080/10410236.2018.1431023
CrossRef global citation count: 2 View in citation network →