Modes of Power in Technical and Professional Visuals

Abstract

Treating visuals as sites of power inscription, the authors advance a Foucauldian design model based on the Panopticon—Bentham's late-eighteenth-century architectural figure for empowerment based on bimodal surveillance. Numerous examples serve in demonstrating that maximum effectiveness results when visuals foster simultaneous viewing in the two panoptic modes, the synoptic and the analytic. The panoptic theory of visual design is shown to be compatible with many privilegings in the literature of visual design that have hitherto appeared ad hoc and undertheorized, with relations masked by the disparate terminologies employed. The limitations of panoptic theory are located in its neglect of oppositional practices—seen as the most compelling horizon for research on the empowerment of designer and viewer through visual design.

Journal
Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Published
1993-01-01
DOI
10.1177/1050651993007001007
Open Access
OA PDF Green
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (15)

  1. Technical Communication Quarterly
  2. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  3. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  4. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  5. Computers and Composition
Show all 15 →
  1. Rhetoric Review
  2. Technical Communication Quarterly
  3. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  4. Written Communication
  5. Technical Communication Quarterly
  6. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  7. Technical Communication Quarterly
  8. Technical Communication Quarterly
  9. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  10. Technical Communication Quarterly

Cites in this index (0)

No references match articles in this index.

Also cites 7 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1177/105065198700100103
  2. 10.1075/idj.2.2.04bur
  3. 10.1093/screen/23.3-4.74
  4. 10.1093/screen/16.3.6
  5. 10.1002/j.2326-1951.1987.tb02941.x
  6. 10.1086/414428
  7. 10.1177/002194368502200101
CrossRef global citation count: 40 View in citation network →