Durable Research, Portable Findings: Rhetorical Methods in Case Study Research

Devon Moriarty University of Waterloo ; Paula Núñez De Villavicencio University of Toronto ; Lillian A. Black University of Waterloo ; Monica Bustos University of Waterloo ; Helen Cai University of Calgary ; Brad Mehlenbacher University of Waterloo ; Ashley Rose Mehlenbacher University of Waterloo

Abstract

Case studies have been a central methodology employed by scholars working in the rhetoric of science and technical communication. However, concerns have been raised about how cases are constructed and collected, and what they convey. The authors reflect on how rhetoricians of science and technical communication researchers can – and do – construct a variety of case-based mixed-methods studies in ways that may make our research more portable and durable without undercutting the important and central role of case-based analysis.

Journal
Technical Communication Quarterly
Published
2019-04-03
DOI
10.1080/10572252.2019.1588376
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (5)

  1. Technical Communication Quarterly
  2. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  3. Technical Communication Quarterly
  4. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  5. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication

References (47) · 8 in this index

  1. ARSTonline. (2013 April 15). ARST oral history project–an interview with Dr. Randy Harris. [Video file] Youtu…
  2. Shaping written knowledge: The genre and activity of the experimental article in science
  3. Science and the internet: Communicating knowledge in a digital age
  4. 10.1177/0162243907306188
  5. Qualitative research methods for the social sciences
Show all 47 →
  1. 10.1162/106361401760375794
  2. Permanence and change: An anatomy of purpose
  3. 10.1080/00335639909384244
  4. 10.7208/chicago/9780226099088.001.0001
  5. 10.1353/rap.2010.0222
  6. Ceccarelli L. (2017). Defending science: How the art of rhetoric can help. http://theconversation.com/defendi…
  7. 10.1016/j.cortex.2015.03.022
  8. Technical Communication Quarterly
  9. Rethinking expertise
  10. 10.1017/CBO9781107295612
  11. 10.1177/0963662512437330
  12. 10.1177/0011000006287390
  13. Rhetoric Review
  14. 10.1016/j.esp.2006.09.004
  15. Written Communication
  16. 10.1080/10417949309372909
  17. 10.1088/0963-6625/3/1/001
  18. Starring the text: The place of rhetoric in science studies
  19. Landmark essays on rhetoric of science: Case studies
  20. Visions and revisions: Issues in rhetoric and composition
  21. Rhetoric and incommensurability
  22. Landmark essays on rhetoric of science: case studies
  23. The rhetoric of expertise
  24. Textual dynamics of the professions: Historical and contemporary studies of writing in pr…
  25. The use of Reddit as an inexpensive source for high-quality data
    Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation
  26. A handbook of media and communication research: Qualitative and quantitative methodologies
  27. 10.4135/9781412957397
  28. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  29. 10.7551/mitpress/9780262013949.001.0001
  30. 10.2307/375964
  31. College English
  32. 10.1023/A:1015241914483
  33. 10.1093/cje/bep058
  34. Poroi
  35. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  36. 10.7551/mitpress/6875.001.0001
  37. Handbook of qualitative research
  38. Human-machine reconfigurations: Plans and situated actions
  39. College English
  40. 10.2307/378336
  41. Wynn J. (2017). Rhetoric of science bibliography (2013–2018). http://www.arstmonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2…
  42. Wynne B. (1989). Sheepfarming after chernobyl: a case study in communicating scientific information. Environm…