Abstract

Meta-cognitive work and consideration of relevant philosophical issues are widely recognized as vital for evolving fields of study. This article suggests that a number of common research practices (over-reliance on case studies and contextualization, in addition to the globalization of rhetoric) have delayed real contemplation of larger issues in RST. The author calls for closer scrutiny of philosophies underlying the practice of RST and a negotiation of social and philosophical vision for the discipline.

Journal
Technical Communication Quarterly
Published
2005-07-01
DOI
10.1207/s15427625tcq1403_7
Open Access
Closed

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (2)

  1. Technical Communication Quarterly
  2. Journal of Business and Technical Communication

Cites in this index (0)

No references match articles in this index.

Also cites 12 works outside this index ↓
  1. Ceccarelli, Leah. Shaping Science with Rhetoric: The Cases of Dobzhansky, Shrodinger, and Wilson. Chicago: U …
  2. 10.1080/00335630009384305
    QJS  
  3. Fahnestock, Jeanne. Rhetorical Figures in Science New York: Oxford UP, 1999.
  4. Fogg, B. J. Persuasive Technology: Using Computers to Change What We Think and Do. San Francisco: Morgan Kauf…
  5. 10.1080/10417949309372909
    Southern Speech Communication Journal  
  6. 10.1353/rap.2002.0035
    Rhetoric and Public Affairs. 5  
  7. 10.1080/00335639909384264
    QJS 85  
  8. Latour, Bruno, and Steve Woolgar. Laboratory Life. Science in Action. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1987.
  9. 10.1353/par.2001.0015
    Philosophy and Rhetoric 34  
  10. 10.1080/00335630209384362
    QJS 88  
  11. 10.1080/00335639409384088
    QJS 80  
  12. 10.1080/00335639909384243
    QJS 85  
CrossRef global citation count: 5 View in citation network →