Linguistic Markers of Stance and Genre in Upper-Level Student Writing

Laura Aull Wake Forest University

Abstract

Stance is a growing focus of academic writing research and an important aspect of writing development in higher education. Research on student writing to date has explored stance across different levels, language backgrounds, and disciplines, but has rarely focused on stance features across genres. This article explores stance marker use between two important genre families in higher education—persuasive argumentative writing and analytic explanatory writing—based on corpus linguistic analysis of late undergraduate and early graduate-level writing in the Michigan Corpus of Upper-Level Student Papers (MICUSP). The specific stance markers in the study, both epistemic and textual cues, have been shown to distinguish student writing across levels; this study, then, extends the analysis to consider the comparative use of these markers across genres. The findings show two stance expectations persistent across genres as well as significant distinctions between argumentative and explanatory writing vis-à-vis stance markers that intensify and contrast. The findings thus point to important considerations for instruction, assignment design, and future research.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
2019-04-01
DOI
10.1177/0741088318819472
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cites in this index (13)

  1. Research in the Teaching of English
  2. Written Communication
  3. Written Communication
  4. College Composition and Communication
  5. Written Communication
Show all 13 →
  1. Written Communication
  2. Written Communication
  3. Written Communication
  4. Written Communication
  5. College Composition and Communication
  6. College Composition and Communication
  7. College Composition and Communication
  8. Written Communication
Also cites 55 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1075/scl.24
  2. 10.1075/ijcl.17.1.01ade
  3. 10.1057/9781137350466
  4. 10.37514/JWA-J.2017.1.1.03
  5. 10.1016/j.jeap.2017.01.005
  6. 10.2307/378428
  7. 10.2307/378935
  8. 10.1016/j.asw.2007.05.001
  9. Biber D. (2006). Stance in spoken and written university registers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes,…
  10. 10.1558/cj.v33i1.26374
    Calico Journal  
  11. 10.1016/j.jeap.2017.10.008
  12. 10.1016/j.esp.2006.08.004
  13. 10.1515/text.2002.020
  14. 10.1016/j.asw.2005.02.001
  15. 10.1016/j.jeap.2015.05.008
  16. 10.1207/s15324818ame0804_1
  17. 10.2307/1512100
  18. 10.2307/377574
  19. 10.1016/1060-3743(94)90005-1
  20. 10.1016/j.jeap.2016.03.002
  21. 10.3366/cor.2013.0040
  22. 10.3102/00346543060002237
  23. 10.2307/j.ctt46nx5z
  24. 10.1016/S0378-2166(98)00009-5
  25. 10.3998/mpub.6719
  26. 10.1177/1461445605050365
  27. 10.1057/9781137030825_9
  28. 10.1016/S1060-3743(97)90033-3
  29. 10.1093/applin/25.2.156
  30. 10.1017/CBO9781139524650
  31. 10.1017/S0261444807004892
  32. Lancaster Z. (2011). Interpersonal stance in L1 and L2 students’ argumentative writing in economics: Implicat…
  33. 10.1080/03075079812331380364
  34. 10.1016/j.jslw.2016.06.004
  35. 10.1016/j.jeap.2012.07.004
  36. 10.2307/465802
  37. 10.1017/CBO9780511981395
  38. 10.1080/00335638409383686
  39. 10.1016/j.pragma.2011.05.002
  40. 10.1017/9781009030199
  41. 10.37514/PER-B.2018.0155
  42. 10.7551/mitpress/7702.001.0001
  43. 10.3366/cor.2011.0011
  44. 10.17239/jowr-2010.02.02.2
  45. 10.1057/9781137030825_11
  46. 10.1016/s1475-1585(03)00051-1
  47. 10.3998/mpub.9059
  48. 10.1016/0889-4906(90)90003-U
  49. 10.1093/applin/22.1.58
  50. 10.1057/9781137030825_8
  51. 10.2307/357609
  52. 10.1016/j.esp.2012.05.005
  53. 10.1016/j.jeap.2011.11.001
  54. 10.2307/358862
  55. 10.1007/s10763-012-9373-9
CrossRef global citation count: 30 View in citation network →