Mastering Academic Language

Written Communication Jan 2013 Open Access

Paola Uccelli Graduate School USA ; Christina L. Dobbs Graduate School USA ; Jessica Scott Graduate School USA

Abstract

Beyond mechanics and spelling conventions, academic writing requires progressive mastery of advanced language forms and functions. Pedagogically useful tools to assess such language features in adolescents’ writing, however, are not yet available. This study examines language predictors of writing quality in 51 persuasive essays produced by high school students attending a linguistically and ethnically diverse inner-city school in the Northeastern United States. Essays were scored for writing quality by a group of teachers, transcribed and analyzed to generate automated lexical and grammatical measures, and coded for discourse-level elements by researchers who were blind to essays’ writing quality scores. Regression analyses revealed that beyond the contribution of length and lexico-grammatical intricacy, the frequency of organizational markers and one particular type of epistemic stance marker (i.e., epistemic hedges) significantly predicted persuasive essays’ writing quality. Findings shed light on discourse elements relevant for the design of pedagogically informative assessment tools.

Journal: Written Communication
Published: 2013-01-01
DOI: 10.1177/0741088312469013
Open Access: OA PDF Green
Topics: multimodality multilingual writers

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (8)

Uccelli (2023)

The Language Demands of Analytical Reading and Writing at School

Written Communication
Black (2022)

Variation in Linguistic Stance: A Person-Centered Analysis of Student Writing

Written Communication
Fang et al. (2022)

Genre and Register Features of Sixth-Grade Students’ Factual Writing

Written Communication
Jo (2021)

Exploring General Versus Academic English Proficiency as Predictors of Adolesce…

Written Communication
Bowen et al. (2020)

Exploring Revisions in Academic Text: Closing the Gap Between Process and Produ…

Written Communication

Show all 8 →

Yoon et al. (2020)

Quantifying Disciplinary Voices: An Automated Approach to Interactional Metadis…

Written Communication
Aull (2019)

Linguistic Markers of Stance and Genre in Upper-Level Student Writing

Written Communication
Hyland et al. (2016)

Change of Attitude? A Diachronic Study of Stance

Written Communication

Cites in this index (1)

McNamara et al. (2010)

Linguistic Features of Writing Quality

Written Communication

Also cites 26 works outside this index ↓

10.1002/9780470694138.ch43

↗
10.1515/LING.2007.001

↗
10.1007/s11145-010-9264-9

↗
10.1075/tilar.3.05ber

↗
10.1017/S0305000904006038

↗
10.1075/wll.5.2.06ber

↗
10.1017/CBO9780511609664.007

↗
10.1075/wll.5.1.02ber

↗
10.1017/CBO9780511519871

↗
10.1080/00405849209543556

↗
10.1093/applin/25.2.220

↗
10.1598/JAAL.44.8.3

↗
10.1515/ling.1992.30.1.5

↗
10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00337.x

↗
10.1017/CBO9780511841057

↗
10.1016/j.asw.2011.07.001

↗
10.1207/s15327973rlsi2603_3

↗
10.1007/978-1-4757-0608-6

↗
10.1017/S0305000902005111

↗
10.1075/wll.5.2.04rei

↗
10.1016/S0898-5898(01)00073-0

↗
10.4324/9781410610317

↗
10.1075/prag.1.1.01slo

↗
10.1017/CBO9780511609664.008

↗
10.1017/CBO9780511840005

↗
10.2307/357609

↗

CrossRef global citation count: 115 View in citation network →