Abstract

Drawing on the appraisal framework from systemic functional linguistics (SFL), this article examines patterns of stance in a corpus of 92 high- and low-graded argumentative papers written in the context of an upper-level course in economics. It interprets differential patterns of stance in students’ texts in light of interview commentaries from the instructors, exploring how their judgments of students’ levels of “critical reasoning” and “analytic rigor,” among other qualities, may be influenced by recurring configurations of stance. As a methodological contribution, the article demonstrates how appraisal analysis of student writing, when used alongside instructor interviews, can reveal types of stances that are tacitly valued in the specific context. Results suggest the need for greater awareness among faculty in the disciplines of what is “going on” when they are reading student work and how they can make their expectations and judgments more explicit to students when assigning and evaluating writing.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
2014-01-01
DOI
10.1177/0741088313515170
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (5)

  1. Written Communication
  2. College Composition and Communication
  3. Written Communication
  4. Written Communication
  5. Written Communication

Cites in this index (0)

No references match articles in this index.

Also cites 23 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.2307/378428
  2. 10.1016/j.jeap.2006.05.001
  3. 10.1515/text.2002.020
  4. 10.1080/17405900500283607
  5. 10.1016/j.asw.2011.01.003
  6. 10.1075/pbns.164.07du
  7. 10.1075/pbns.164
  8. 10.1016/j.jeap.2005.11.001
  9. 10.1177/1461445605050365
  10. 10.1057/9781137030825
  11. 10.1075/swll.5
  12. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331646.001.0001
  13. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331646.003.0002
  14. 10.1093/oso/9780198238546.003.0008
  15. 10.1057/9780230511910
  16. 10.1093/applin/ami023
  17. The structure of written communication: Studies in reciprocity between writers and readers
  18. 10.2307/4140681
  19. Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse
  20. 10.1057/9781137030825_8
  21. 10.4324/9781410609724
  22. 10.1515/text.2003.011
  23. 10.1016/j.jeap.2007.09.006
CrossRef global citation count: 58 View in citation network →