Abstract

The goal of teaching students to write for the university assumes that in first-year composition students can be taught ways of writing (genre and genre knowledge) that they can then transfer to the writing they do in other courses across the university. This goal and its underlying assumption are problematic for a number of reasons illustrated here through a study of a large midwestern composition program. The study validates theoretical critiques of general skills writing courses made by genre and activity theorists over the past decade. The difficulties of teaching varied academic genres in only one context suggest we might better serve first-year students by reframing the goals of FYC, such that the course does not promise to teach students to write in the university but rather teaches students about writing in the university.

Journal
College Composition and Communication
Published
2009-06-01
DOI
10.58680/ccc20097196
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (25)

  1. Pedagogy
  2. Computers and Composition
  3. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  4. Written Communication
  5. Teaching English in the Two-Year College
Show all 25 →
  1. Writing and Pedagogy
  2. College Composition and Communication
  3. Pedagogy
  4. Reflections: A Journal of Community-Engaged Writing and Rhetoric
  5. College Composition and Communication
  6. Technical Communication Quarterly
  7. College Composition and Communication
  8. Written Communication
  9. Pedagogy
  10. Written Communication
  11. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  12. Computers and Composition
  13. Assessing Writing
  14. Computers and Composition
  15. Written Communication
  16. Assessing Writing
  17. Literacy in Composition Studies
  18. Written Communication
  19. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  20. Written Communication

References (0)

No references on file for this article.