Abstract

The goal of teaching students to write for the university assumes that in first-year composition students can be taught ways of writing (genre and genre knowledge) that they can then transfer to the writing they do in other courses across the university. This goal and its underlying assumption are problematic for a number of reasons illustrated here through a study of a large midwestern composition program. The study validates theoretical critiques of general skills writing courses made by genre and activity theorists over the past decade. The difficulties of teaching varied academic genres in only one context suggest we might better serve first-year students by reframing the goals of FYC, such that the course does not promise to teach students to write in the university but rather teaches students about writing in the university.

Journal
College Composition and Communication
Published
2009-06-01
DOI
10.58680/ccc20097196
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (19)

  1. Pedagogy
  2. Computers and Composition
  3. Written Communication
  4. Teaching English in the Two-Year College
  5. College Composition and Communication
Show all 19 →
  1. Pedagogy
  2. College Composition and Communication
  3. Technical Communication Quarterly
  4. College Composition and Communication
  5. Written Communication
  6. Pedagogy
  7. Written Communication
  8. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  9. Computers and Composition
  10. Computers and Composition
  11. Written Communication
  12. Written Communication
  13. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  14. Written Communication

Cites in this index (0)

No references match articles in this index.

CrossRef global citation count: 61 View in citation network →