Abstract

Research abstracts are an increasingly important aspect of research articles in all knowledge fields, summarizing the full article and encouraging readers to access it. Graetz suggests that four main features contribute to this purpose—the use of past tense, third person, passive, and the non-use of negatives, although this claim has never been confirmed. In this article, we set out to explore the extent to which these forms are used in the abstracts of four disciplines, the functions they perform and how their frequency has changed over the past 30 years. Drawing on a corpus of 6,000 abstracts taken from the top 10 journals in each of four disciplines at three distinct time periods, we found high but decreasing frequencies of past tense and passives, an increasing number of third person forms, and more than one negation every two texts. We also noted a remarkable decrease of past tense and passives in the hard sciences and an increase in applied linguistics, with sociologists making greater use of negation. These results suggest that abstracts have developed a distinctive argumentative style, rhetorically linked both to their communicative function and to the changing social contexts in which academic writing is produced and consumed.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
2023-01-01
DOI
10.1177/07410883221128876
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (1)

  1. Written Communication
Also cites 36 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1186/s40554-017-0045-5
  2. 10.1080/03075078712331378052
  3. 10.1075/z.232
  4. 10.1017/CBO9781139208833
  5. 10.1075/fol.1.1.03col
  6. 10.4324/9780203856949-17
  7. 10.1515/9783110219302.9
  8. 10.1080/07268602.2019.1542932
  9. 10.1111/j.1475-682X.2008.00246.x
  10. 10.1002/asi.24206
  11. 10.4324/9781315179346-11
  12. 10.1016/j.jeap.2010.02.004
  13. 10.1093/oso/9780195134544.001.0001
  14. 10.1075/fol.7.2.03her
  15. 10.1093/applin/20.3.341
  16. 10.3998/mpub.6719
  17. 10.1075/ds.23.02hyl
  18. 10.1080/07268602.2018.1400498
  19. 10.4324/9780429433962
  20. 10.1177/00754242211019080
  21. 10.1016/j.esp.2004.02.002
  22. 10.1016/j.esp.2016.11.001
  23. 10.1016/j.esp.2022.06.003
  24. 10.1016/S0889-4906(97)00058-6
  25. 10.1142/6286
  26. 10.1515/text-2020-2066
  27. 10.1515/9783110197631
  28. 10.1093/applin/10.1.1
  29. 10.1016/j.jeap.2018.08.002
  30. 10.1075/z.231
  31. 10.17265/2159-5313/2016.09.003
  32. 10.1016/S0889-4906(05)80002-X
  33. 10.1075/jhp.14.1.03seo
  34. 10.1016/j.jeap.2019.01.003
  35. 10.3998/mpub.309332
  36. 10.1016/0272-2380(81)90004-4
CrossRef global citation count: 16 View in citation network →