Written Communication Mar 2026

Metadiscoursal Superimposition as a Methodological Approach: Towards a Structured, Quantifiable, and Functionally Enriched Framework of Interactional Metadiscourse

Višnja Pavičić Takač University of Osijek ; Vesna Bogdanović University of Novi Sad

Abstract

Despite extensive research on metadiscourse, methodology descriptions in research articles provide limited guidance on how to identify, classify, and, particularly in cases of clustered items, quantify metadiscourse markers. This article discusses the methodological challenges of analysing metadiscoursal adjectives, using the example of novice academic writers’ use of adjectival interactional metadiscourse markers. Our exploratory analysis of the corpus (654,925 tokens) revealed that, in a non-negligible number of cases (13.5%), metadiscoursal adjectives co-occurred with other linguistic items that were performing different metadiscoursal functions, thus putting a different interpretation on the initial observation. The phenomenon whereby both the adjective and its co-occurring item exercise a prominent metadiscoursal function—which we labelled superimposition —has been observed in previous studies but has not been adequately explored and has led to divergent, and often incomparable approaches, to metadiscourse quantification. We argue that metadiscoursal superimposition as a methodological approach can help bridge the gap between the individual marker analysis and their use in academic writing discourse, thus providing a structured, quantifiable, and functionally richer framework. We discuss the benefits, possible pitfalls, and implications of our proposal that superimposition be included and quantified as a supplementary step in metadiscourse quantification analyses.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
2026-03-06
DOI
10.1177/07410883251410162
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
discourse analysis
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (56) · 7 in this index

  1. 10.1177/14614456020040020101
     ↗
  2. 10.1075/scl.24
     ↗
  3. Ädel A. (2023). Adopting a ‘move’ rather than a ‘marker’ approach to metadiscourse: A taxonomy for spoken stu…
     ↗
  4. Akbas E. (2017)
    Metadiscourse in written genres: Uncovering textual and interactional aspects of texts
  5. Aull et al. (2014)
    Linguistic Markers of Stance in Early and Advanced Academic Writing: A Corpus-b…
    Written Communication
Show all 56 →
  1. BEAUVAIS (1989)
    A Speech Act Theory of Metadiscourse
    Written Communication
  2. Biber D. (1999)
    The Longman grammar of spoken and written English
  3. Bitchener J. Basturkmen H. (2006). Perceptions of the difficulties of postgraduate L2 thesis students writing…
     ↗
  4. Bogdanović V. Topalov J. Pavičić Takač V. (2023). The analysis of graduate students’ use of transition marker…
  5. 10.1016/S0889-4906(98)00022-2
     ↗
  6. Chen T.-Y. (2012)
    Genre-based analysis of the information structure of master’s theses in applied linguistics
    The Asian ESP Journal
  7. Cheung Y. L. Lau L. (2020). Authorial voice in academic writing: A comparative study of journal articles in E…
     ↗
  8. Consonni S. (2020)
    Digital communication and metadiscourse: Changing perspectives in academic genres
  9. Crismore A. (1989)
    Talking with readers: Metadiscourse as rhetorical act
  10. CRISMORE et al. (1993)
    Metadiscourse in Persuasive Writing: A Study of Texts Written by American and F…
    Written Communication
  11. Francis G. (1994)
    Advances in written text analysis
  12. Halliday M. A. K. (1976)
    Cohesion in English
  13. Hinkel E. (2004)
    Teaching academic ESL writing: Practical techniques in vocabulary and grammar
  14. Hint et al. (2025)
    Decoding Metadiscourse Markers in Estonian Academic Texts: A Language-Specific …
    Written Communication
  15. Hyland K. (2005)
    Metadiscourse: Exploring interaction in writing
  16. Hyland K. (2010). Constructing proximity: Relating to readers in popular and professional science. Journal of…
     ↗
  17. Hyland K. (2017). Metadiscourse: What is it and where is it going? Journal of Pragmatics 113 16–29. https://d…
     ↗
  18. Hyland K. (2019)
    Metadiscourse: Exploring interaction in writing
  19. Hyland K. Jiang F. K. (2017). Is academic writing becoming more informal? English for Specific Purposes 45 40…
     ↗
  20. Hyland K. Jiang F. K. (2018). “In this paper we suggest”: Changing patterns of disciplinary metadiscourse. En…
     ↗
  21. Hyland K. Jiang F. K. (2022). Metadiscourse choices in EAP: An intra-journal study of JEAP. Journal of Englis…
     ↗
  22. Jiang F. K. (2015). Nominal stance construction in L1 and L2 students’ writing. Journal of English for Academ…
     ↗
  23. Langacker R. W. (1987)
    Foundations of cognitive grammar: Vol. 1. Theoretical prerequisites
  24. Langacker R. W. (1991)
    Foundations of cognitive grammar: Vol. 2. Descriptive application
  25. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001
     ↗
  26. Larsson T. (2017). A functional classification of the introductory it pattern: Investigating academic writing…
     ↗
  27. Lee J. J. Casal J. E. (2014). Metadiscourse in results and discussion chapters: A cross-linguistic analysis o…
     ↗
  28. Li L. (2017)
    Metadiscourse in written genres: Uncovering textual and interactional aspects of texts
  29. Mauranen A. (1993)
    Cultural differences in academic rhetoric: A textlinguistic study
  30. McKeown K. R. (2000)
    Handbook of natural language processing
  31. Molino A. (2010). Personal and impersonal authorial references: A contrastive study of English and Italian Li…
     ↗
  32. Nation I. S. P. (1990)
    Teaching and learning vocabulary
  33. Nishina Y. (2010). Evaluative meanings and disciplinary values: A corpus-based study of adjective patterns in…
  34. 10.1016/j.esp.2025.11.003
     ↗
  35. Pavičić Takač V. Vakanjac Ivezić S. (2019). Frame markers and coherence in L2 argumentative essays. Discourse…
     ↗
  36. Pearson W. S. Abdollahzadeh E. (2023). Metadiscourse in academic writing: A systematic review. Lingua 293 Art…
     ↗
  37. 10.1017/9781316423530.007
     ↗
  38. Quirk R. (1985)
    A comprehensive grammar of the English language
  39. Sanz R. L. (2006)
    “I will argue that”: First person pronouns as metadiscoursal devices in research article …
    ESP Across Cultures
  40. Takimoto M. (2015). A corpus-based analysis of hedges and boosters in English academic articles. Indonesian J…
     ↗
  41. Thompson G. (1995)
    The sound of one hand clapping: The management of interaction in written discourse
    Text & Talk
  42. Kopple (1985)
    Some Exploratory Discourse on Metadiscourse
    College Composition and Communication
  43. Vande Kopple W. J (2002)
    Discourse studies in composition
  44. Vande Kopple W. J (2012)
    The importance of studying metadiscourse
    Applied Research on English Language
  45. Varga M. (2020)
    Languages and cultures in time and space
  46. 10.1016/S0889-4906(99)00029-0
     ↗
  47. Walková M. (2018). Author’s self-representation in research articles by Anglophone and Slovak linguists. Disc…
     ↗
  48. Williams J. M. (2014)
    Lessons in clarity and grace
  49. Wilson-Lopez A. Minichiello A. Green T. (2019). An inquiry into the use of intercoder reliability measures in…
  50. Yoon (2017)
    Textual voice elements and voice strength in EFL argumentative writing
    Assessing Writing
  51. Yoon et al. (2020)
    Quantifying Disciplinary Voices: An Automated Approach to Interactional Metadis…
    Written Communication
CrossRef global citation count: 0 View in citation network → Build reading path →

Related Articles

  1. Computers and Composition Jun 2026
    Historicizing critical discourse about emergent tools and technologies across 40 years of Computers and Composition ↗
    Meghan Velez; Kara Taczak; Matthew D. Bryan
    discourse analysis digital rhetoric
  2. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly May 2026
    Communicating Diversity and Inclusion in LinkedIn Job Advertisements ↗
    Rashid Ashraf; Said Badreddine; Mohamed I. Albeshr; Hamsa Al Ammari; Malik Muhammad Sheheryar Khan; Pranav Naithani
    discourse analysis professional writing race and writing
  3. Written Communication May 2026
    Untold Pushbacks: Synthesizing Discourse-Based and Phenomenological Interviewing to Explore Tacit Knowledges of Black and Latinx Writers ↗
    Ray Rosas
    discourse analysis
  4. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly Apr 2026
    Bridging Curricula and Workplaces in China: A Needs-Based Model for Arabic Business Communication ↗
    Suo Yan Mei; Suo Yan Ju; Zarima Mohd Zakaria
    discourse analysis teacher development professional writing
  5. Res Rhetorica Apr 2026
    Logos in ancient Greek discourse on rhetoric: An overview ↗
    Arkadiusz Sokolnicki
    classical rhetoric rhetorical criticism discourse analysis argument