Wearing a Pith Helmet at a Sly Angle:

Abstract

The entry of ethnography and ethnographic methods into writing research, particularly during the 1980s, has been highly productive. However, this research continues to ignore many of the doubts concerning ethnography that anthropologists themselves have been raising for a number of years. This article (a) outlines more than a decade of civil war among anthropologists, (b) considers the relevance of that debate to writing researchers working ethnographically, (c) argues for more experimental ethnographic texts in contrast to the entrenched models that currently rule the field and despite the institutional resistance that experimental texts are bound to generate, and (d) suggests in cursory fashion the fate of “postmodernist” discourse in the context of the more normative discourse of institutional life. Along the way, the article analyzes some of the rhetoric of the ethnographic work of writing researchers, including Heath's Ways With Words.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
1993-07-01
DOI
10.1177/0741088393010003003
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (5)

  1. Written Communication
  2. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  3. Written Communication
  4. Written Communication
  5. Technical Communication Quarterly

Cites in this index (2)

  1. Written Communication
  2. Written Communication
Also cites 13 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1525/aeq.1987.18.2.04x0666p
  2. 10.1111/an.1990.31.2.28.1
  3. 10.1086/203840
  4. 10.1080/03637759109376222
  5. 10.1525/aeq.1991.22.1.05x1170z
  6. 10.1525/ahu.1991.16.1.12
  7. 10.2307/378107
  8. 10.37514/JBW-J.1988.7.2.02
    Journal of Basic Writing  
  9. 10.1525/aeq.1987.18.4.04x0025y
  10. 10.1525/can.1988.3.4.02a00010
  11. Hermeneutics and the human sciences: Essays on language, action, and interpretation
  12. 10.1086/203652
  13. 10.1086/jar.47.1.3630581
CrossRef global citation count: 11 View in citation network →