Written Communication Jan 2025

Beyond Surfaces and Depths: An SFL Analysis of Fine Gradations of Meaning in Undergraduates’ Writing About Literature

Ruth Li Alfaisal University

Abstract

Students are expected to interpret the complexities and nuances of literary texts yet might struggle with interpreting texts in ways that are valued in literary studies. Examining students’ language choices can support instructors and students with developing concrete, explicit understandings of the ways language creates meanings in discourse. This study draws on the Appraisal framework within Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL) to analyze essays from two introductory writing about literature courses. Findings illustrate that more proficient writers interpret possible significances using Appreciation and Engagement resources and construe subtle shades of significance using Graduation resources. This linguistic analysis illustrates the ways abstract qualities of literary interpretation including nuance can be seen in students’ specific language choices. By exposing the fine-grained elements of meaning in students’ writing, this study creates pathways toward stimulating students’ and instructors’ metalinguistic awareness of how specific language choices create disciplinarily-valued qualities of writing.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
10.1177/07410883241286899
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
discourse analysis first-year composition
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (32) · 12 in this index

  1. 10.1057/9781137350466
     ↗
  2. Aull et al. (2014)
    Linguistic Markers of Stance in Early and Advanced Academic Writing: A Corpus-b…
    Written Communication
  3. Banting (2023)
    Humanistic Knowledge-Making and the Rhetoric of Literary Criticism: Special Top…
    Written Communication
  4. 10.1353/lit.2015.0006
     ↗
  5. Chick et al. (2009)
    “Pressing an Ear against the Hive”
    Pedagogy
Show all 32 →
  1. 10.20343/teachlearninqu.7.1.2
     ↗
  2. FAHNESTOCK et al. (1988)
    The Stases in Scientific and Literary Argument
    Written Communication
  3. Fahnestock J. (1991)
    Textual dynamics of the professions: Historical and contemporary studies of writing in pr…
  4. Halliday M. A. K. (1985)
    Language, context, and text: Aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective
  5. 10.1177/1474022216652766
     ↗
  6. Hood S. (2005)
    Continuing discourse on language: A functional perspective
  7. Humphrey S., Droga L., Feez S. (2012). Grammar and meaning (pp. 86–99). Primary English Teaching Association.…
  8. 10.1016/j.jeap.2016.05.006
     ↗
  9. Lancaster (2016)
    Using Corpus Results to Guide the Discourse-Based Interview: A Case Study of a …
    Journal of Writing Research
  10. 10.1093/oso/9780198238546.003.0008
     ↗
  11. Martin J. R. (2003)
    The language of evaluation
  12. 10.4324/9780203966273-9
     ↗
  13. 10.1086/448929
     ↗
  14. Regaignon (2009)
    Traction
    Pedagogy
  15. Schleppegrell M. J. (2013). The role of metalanguage in supporting academic language development. Language Le…
     ↗
  16. Schilb (2001)
    Preparing Graduate Students to Teach Literature: Composition Studies as a Possi…
    Pedagogy
  17. Smith B. H. (1995)
    Critical Terms for Literary Study
  18. Sullivan P. (2017)
    Deep reading: Teaching reading in the writing classroom
  19. Tinkle et al. (2013)
    Teaching Close Reading Skills in a Large Lecture Course
    Pedagogy
  20. 10.1353/elh.2015.0042
     ↗
  21. 10.1002/9781118611463.wbielsi041
     ↗
  22. Wilder (2002)
    “Get Comfortable With Uncertainty”: A Study of the Conventional Values of Liter…
    Written Communication
  23. Wilder (2005)
    “The Rhetoric of Literary Criticism” Revisited: Mistaken Critics, Complex Conte…
    Written Communication
  24. Wilder L. (2012)
    Rhetorical strategies and genre conventions in literary studies: Teaching and writing in …
  25. Wilder et al. (2009)
    Sharing the Tacit Rhetorical Knowledge of the Literary Scholar: The Effects of …
    Research in the Teaching of English
  26. Wolfe (2003)
    A Method for Teaching Invention in the Gateway Literature Class
    Pedagogy
  27. Wolfe J. (2016)
    Digging into literature: Strategies for reading, analysis, and writing
CrossRef global citation count: 0 View in citation network → Build reading path →

Related Articles

  1. Technical Communication Quarterly Oct 2024
    Editors’ Use of Comprehensive Style Guides: The Case of Singular They ↗
    Jo Mackiewicz; Shaya Kraut; Allison Durazzi
    rhetorical criticism discourse analysis first-year composition writing pedagogy graduate education teacher development writing centers technical communication professional writing digital rhetoric multilingual writers grammar and mechanics literacy studies race and writing public rhetoric editorial matter
  2. Writing and Pedagogy Apr 2024
    Designing Writing Across the Professions (WAP) programs at the intersection of work-integrated learning and writing transfer research ↗
    Ina Alexandra Machura; Michael-John DePalma; Michelle J. Eady; Kara Taczak
    rhetorical criticism genre theory discourse analysis first-year composition writing pedagogy transfer
  3. Pedagogy Jan 2024
    The “Knocking Heart” ↗
    Sarah Moon
    modern rhetorical theory discourse analysis first-year composition writing pedagogy qualitative research
  4. Pedagogy Jan 2024
    The Radical Role of Student Writing in Composition ↗
    Jessica Masterson
    modern rhetorical theory rhetorical criticism genre theory discourse analysis cultural rhetorics first-year composition writing pedagogy graduate education teacher development argument collaborative writing professional writing grammar and mechanics literacy studies race and writing gender and writing
  5. Composition Forum 2024
    Terminology Matters: Taking Back Outcomes and Objectives in Composition Studies ↗
    Alyssa Devey
    discourse analysis first-year composition curriculum design